Showing posts with label Sepang. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sepang. Show all posts

Monday, April 6, 2009

Button Wins for 2nd Time in Malaysian Grand Prix


RAIN RAIN GO AWAY

WET WET WET

Button Wins for 2nd Time in Malaysian Grand Prix ( NEW YORK TIMES EXCERPT)

QUOTE : "I’ve experienced some incredible downpours before in Sepang. Here, the rain is far from normal. When the Heavens open, everything disappears under water in no time." Nick Heidfeld.


By BRAD SPURGEON
Published: April 5, 2009

KUALA LUMPUR — Under a dark sky with lighting flashing and thunder clapping and torrential rain flooding the track on Sunday, officials red-flagged the Malaysian Grand Prix only one hour into the race for safety reasons.
Then, for nearly an hour the cars and drivers sat parked on the starting grid and they and spectators waited expectantly for the rain to stop, while wondering if the race would restart. The rain got weaker, but the sky became darker as evening approached, and 52 minutes later, race control announced that the race would not restart.
Sitting in his car with his helmet off, Jenson Button, the winner of the race the week before, broke into a huge smile: He had just won the second race of the season. Nick Heidfeld was second in a BMW Sauber, and Timo Glock was third in a Toyota.
“Wow, what a race — we had everything in that race,” Button said, adding that it was getting so dark he could not see, and despite driving at a walking pace at the end, he could barely keep the car on the track. “I would rather have had a boring race.”
It was the second dull ending in two races this season, however. The first race, the Australian Grand Prix in Melbourne a week earlier, ended at slow speed behind a safety car after an accident three laps before the end.
The race Sunday ran only 32 of the projected 56 laps. Because not even 75 percent of the race had been run, only half points are awarded to drivers and teams. It was only the fifth time in the series’ 59-year history that there has been a half-point race. The last time was the Australian Grand Prix at Adelaide in 1991.
But it was clearly impossible to continue. The race began at 5 p.m. to reach European television audiences in the morning. But with no lighting around the circuit, it became too dark. Although the television images of the cars parked on the grid under the rain looked bright as daylight, it was actually dark as night.
The drivers all agreed it was the right call to stop the race.
“It was the right decision,” Button said. “I would love to have had the 10 points, but this was the right thing. Some people will say, ‘We didn’t see the whole race and it’s disappointing.’ But we have to think of safety. There are limits to what we can do.”
Heidfeld agreed. “It felt like walking speed and still we were spinning off,” he said.
But if the weather and race timing brought bad news, it was indeed an exciting, wild race while it lasted. Button started at pole position but got off to a bad start and immediately lost the lead of the race to Nico Rosberg in a Williams, who had started in fourth position and skirted the two Toyotas of Timo Glock and Jarno Trulli before passing Button.
There was much overtaking thanks to new rules that permit drivers to pass more easily. But another, odd factor also helped create a lot of action: With the rain imminent, drivers had to decide when they should put on rain tires. Some drivers chose intermediate rain tires — with a little tread — while others chose the full wet tires, which have deeper treads.
But the full wets are slower, and everything came down to timing. Heidfeld, who had started 10th, owed his second-place finish entirely to the tire gamble.
“It started to rain and it was clear it would rain heavily and so we went on extra wets and I tried to preserve my tires,” Heidfeld said. “The team told me heavy rain was coming, and it didn’t happen, didn’t happen. They called me in and, just as they did, it started raining and I said ‘I’m staying out.’”
Button too said his victory had come down to good strategy and observing what other drivers did with their tires.
Indeed, after his bad start Button became dominant once he retook the lead after 17 laps when the two cars in front of him, Rosberg and Trulli, made pit stops.
Ferrari, on the other hand, failed miserably. After Lap 18, Kimi Raikkonen, the Ferrari driver, was in fifth position and made a pit stop and was the first to put on rain tires. It was far too early. Raikkonen immediately dropped down to 15th position and continued to lose ground on the leaders, as the rain did not begin to fall until Lap 22.
At that point, all the other cars made a pit stop for rain tires. But Raikkonen was so far back he remained there, and by the time the race was stopped, he was still in 14th position.
The last 10 laps of the race were a palpitating display of the kind of racing fans have been asking for: Heated battles for position with drivers passing each other incessantly. Lewis Hamilton in a McLaren Mercedes and Mark Webber in a Red Bull carried on a long battle on Laps 24 and 25, which Webber eventually won.
But by Lap 31 the rain had increased so much and the sky had become so dark that several of the cars began spinning off the track. Sebastian Vettel in a Red Bull spun out, and his car sat in a dangerous position at the edge of the track.

Thursday, April 2, 2009

FORMULA 1 - HOW DOES IT WORK ? ( An Excerpt)


JENSEN BUTTON - FI CHAMPION AT KL SEPANG CIRCUIT ON 5 APRIL 2009



INSIGHT
Formula 1 funding - how does it work?
JANUARY 5, 2006
BY JOE SAWARD


Many people, even in the sport, do not really understand how Formula 1 racing is funded. It is a complicated business and very different from the way in which other sports work. It has its advantages and its disadvantages.

The traditional sports marketing model is that the holders of the rights to a sport control events which have a value to television broadcasters. The TV companies bid for the right to broadcast the events. Broadcasters package and promote the events for their audiences and hope that advertisers will pay premium prices for the time available during the coverage of these high rating events. Advertising rates for the Super Bowl, the Olympics and World Cup soccer matches are extraordinary. Last year's Super Bowl, for example, had rates of $2.4m for a 30-second slot. There were 60 slots and so the network made $144m from the one broadcast. In addition to that Ameriquest Mortgage paid $15m to sponsor the intermission, featuring rock star Paul McCartney.

Substantial profits mean that the TV companies can afford to invest more in paying for the rights. The thing that complicates the business is the need for venues. The rights holder has to negotiate deals for venues: either paying them or being paid by them, depending on the popularity of the sport. The International Olympic Committee, which has a very bankable business in the Olympic Games, can demand huge investment from cities bidding for the Games. These cities feel their bids are justified to promote local economic growth, build up tourism or improve the image of the city.

There are many different motivations.

In smaller sports the involvement of the venues is more complicated. Sometimes the teams involved will own their own stadium - notably in soccer, baseball and so on. Other venues are owned by local governments. Facility management is an industry in its own right with venues bidding for events and making money by selling tickets, merchandise, food and beverages, naming rights and so on.

There are times also when venues are rented out to promoters, who create their own events, negotiate TV deals, sign up sponsors and attract big name contestants with good prize money. This is widespread in boxing and in motor racing is seen with the Race of Champions event in Paris.

The key driver in the sports marketing business is that the activity involved is of interest to the largest number of people possible. This attracts the money and the rest follows.

It is what happens to that money that makes the difference between the different sports.

In Formula 1 the rights holder is the international automobile federation, which in French is called the Federation Internationale de l'Automobile. It is known as the FIA as a result of the French name.

The FIA decided a few years ago that it did not wish to deal with all the comlicated issues involved in the commercial exploitation of the sport. It therefore negotiated a 100-year lease of the rights to a private company in Britain. There is a complex structure of companies but in general terms this is the known as the Formula One group. It is important that one distinguishes between Formula 1 and Formula One because one is the name by which the sport is best known and the other is the company involved. They are not synonymous on all occasions. Nor does the Formula One group own every company with the words Formula One in their names.

The Formula One group is currently in the process of being sold with three banks getting rid of their shareholdings and a venture capital company called CVC buying control. This company will have Bernie Ecclestone as a minor shareholder. Ecclestone is the man who set up the system in the 1980s and 1990s before he began selling off shares in the business to cash in on his success. He remains a key player because he invented the system and because he has enormous influence over those involved.

Ecclestone thus controls the rights to the sport but his organisation does not exploit all of them because it is simply not a big enough organization. Like the FIA, Ecclestone was not interested in exploiting all the rights. So, in an effort to maximise his profits and minimise his costs, Ecclestone did a deal with another private company called Allsport Management in Geneva. This is run by former journalist Paddy McNally and leases the rights to sell trackside signage, title sponsorships, VIP entertainment, official supplier programmes and various other bits and pieces from the Formula One Group. In exchange McNally pays Formula One Management an annual fee of around $50m. McNally makes probably twice that, perhaps more.

Formula One however retains the other rights, notably the TV deals and negotiates with the teams and with the venues. Formula 1 is so popular that venues have to pay - just as in the case of the Olympic Games. In addition to that they have to meet stringent (and expensive) standards and have to sacrifice many of the traditional sources of income for venues. In most cases, for example, they are not allowed to sell their own signage. They pay a minimum of $13m a year and the contracts seem to include annual increase of 10%. All the circuits have available to recoup these costs are the ticket sales, which explains why F1 tickets can be very expensive. One way around the problem is to expand the capacity of the stadiums, which is sometimes possible but requires a big investment. However this means that the venues can lower the ticket prices and pull in more people. Unfortunately, for this to work there needss to be enough demand - and that is not always the case.

The result of all this is that some venues do not make profits and, in a lot of cases, they need the support of local government money to survive. The local authorities generally seem to feel that the Grands Prix are good for them and that it is worth the money they have to invest.

The Formula 1 teams fund most of their activities with sponsorships, partnerships and revenues from merchandising. However an important source of income is also the payment made to the teams by the Formula One group. There is an agreement in place between the teams, the Formula One group and the FIA. This is called the Concorde Agreement and this is a legally-binding contract which covers all areas of the sport. This details all the various divisions of powers, money and responsibilities but it is confidential.

One of the drawbacks of this system is that the sport gives off an image of being overly secretive and not fully transparent and that has had the effect - along with tobacco money - of driving away some big sponsors and financial institutions that might otherwise be involved if the sport had a more wholesome image.

The payments to the teams are secret but they are based to some extent on performance and to some extent on how important the teams are for the sport. Most of the teams do not really understand why they are being paid the sums they are being paid but they do not ask questions. There is friction because some teams feel that the teams should all get the same money and that there should be no special deals for teams like Ferrari, which reputedly is deemed to be more important that other teams and so gets more cash.

Once it has paid its bills, the Formula One keeps the rest of the money, which makes it a hugely successful business but this success has created problems because the teams, being the actors in the drama, believe that they should get more of the money.

It is a fair point and the negotiation process for a more equitable deal has been ongoing for some time with threats of a`rival championship and so on.

The other big weakness of the system is that the FIA member clubs do not benefit much from the success of Formula 1. The lease fee paid by the Formula One group was a one-time payment - although there are believed to be some annual recurring costs as well. The money - which was only around $350m - went into a foundation which funds research programmes for the FIA but the many millions that the sport generates are not filtering through to the sport to grassroots level as happens in other sports. This means that there is no investment in the sport at lower levels and also means that poor countries have no real chance to ever build up a motor racing infrastructure. They cannot even afford to pay for a local rally series, a kart track or a scholarship scheme for a talented youngster. This is a source of discontent amongst some of the clubs but to date no-one has seriously challenged the logic of the deal nor the power of the current FIA leadership.

Despite these flaws, Formula 1 is hugely successful and has created probably 200 or more millionaires over the last 25 years. It has made Ecclestone a multibillionaire and it continues to go from strength to strength. The various parties involved push and shove and whine and gripe and perhaps there are better ways for the sport to be structured but things are not about to change in a short period of time.

Perhaps when some of the current personalities involved have moved on there will be reform but until they do they will be fighting as they always have done.

____________________________________________________________________________________

Brawn GP

Brawn GP Ltd. is a Formula One motor racing team and constructor. It was formed on 6 March 2009 after it was confirmed that Ross Brawn, the ex-team principal of the Honda Racing F1 Team, had bought the team from Honda in the wake of the withdrawal from the sport of the Japanese marque in December 2008, and on 17 March 2009 the FIA officially agreed to the name change from Honda Racing F1 Team to Brawn GP. Brawn GP were considered to be an entirely new entry, but the FIA agreed to waive the standard entry fee.The new team made its racing debut at the 2009 season-opening Australian Grand Prix on 28 March 2009, where they took the pole and 2nd place in qualifying. The team went on to win the top two positions in their debut Grand Prix race on 29 March 2009, with Jenson Button winning the race and Rubens Barrichello coming in second. However, the results are provisional subject to an ongoing appeal over the team's diffusers.

The team use Mercedes-Benz engines and its cars are driven by the ex-Honda partnership of Jenson Button and Rubens Barrichello, which has lasted for 3 years.

History 2009

Although Honda were thought to be the first team to run a KERS in 2008,Ross Brawn stated in an interview that due to the circumstances of the change in ownership the team did not have the time to develop the system yet.On the 20th of March it was confirmed that Brawn GP will be allocated the final pitlane slot, with Force India moving up one slot. Bernie Ecclestone suggested that this is due to the takeover involving a name change, saying that if it was called Honda...whatever was due to Honda, they would have got'. This also resulted in Brawn being changed to car numbers 22 and 23, because promotional material of Force India had already been printed with numbers 20 and 21. The team started off strongly on the Friday Practice of the Australian Grand Prix finishing in the top 5. In qualifying at Australia Jenson Button took pole with fellow teammate Rubens Barrichello coming 2nd followed by Red Bull Racing's Sebastian Vettel. This was followed by a race win for Jenson Button, who led from start to finish, with Barrichello second giving Brawn a 1-2 finish on their debut, which had not happened since Mercedes managed it in 1954.

The Brawn BGP 001 during testing.

Following Honda's withdrawal, development of the BGP 001 never stopped and on the day of its debut, Jenson Button performed its shakedown – the car featuring white, fluorescent yellow and black colours. The team gave the BGP 001 its first test at Circuit de Catalunya on 9 March 2009, topping the timesheets many times. With the testing moving to Circuito de Jerez, Brawn GP continued to set the pace, finishing the test leading two of the three tests. During an interview Brawn said there was more speed to come after he explained that '...The BGP 001 car is the result of 15 months of intensive development work and the team have been nothing less than fantastic in their commitment to producing two cars in time for the first race'. At the first race an official complaint was launched by four teams against the rear diffusers of the Williams FW31, Toyota TF109 and the Brawn BGP 001 on the grounds that they did not fall within the dimensions set out in the regulations, but after analysing the cars the race stewards reported that the cars were legal. This ruling has been appealed, the appeal will be heard after the second race of the season.

Sponsorship

On 26 March 2009, Brawn GP announced a partnership with British clothing manufacturer Henri Lloyd. The company will supply the team with clothing and footwear technology and their brand will appear on the BGP 001. On 28 March 2009 Sir Richard Branson announced Virgin as a major sponsor for the team.