Why U.S. leaders hate Iran

Why U.S. leaders hate Iran

An Excerpt
Tuesday, January 20, 2009 2:06 AM MST

Editor:

We are at war, we are told, because the terrorists hate us for our freedoms. I think it is because we want their oil and they don’t want to give it to us.

President Jimmy Carter made our position clear: "Any attempt by any outside force to gain control of the Persian Gulf region will be regarded as an assault on the vital interests of the United States." The president may have been thinking of Russia or China, but the threat came from Iran. There the elected prime minister, Mohammad Mussadeq, announced his intention to nationalize Iran’s oil industry so that the oil profits could be used for the Iranian people instead of foreign investors. To do that he had to expel the king, Shah Pahlavi, who favored Texaco, Mobil, BP, etc.

Our CIA sent its agent, Kermit Roosevelt, to Iran with a bulging briefcase full of enough money to bribe Iranian army officers to arrest the prime minister and bring back the king.

The New York Times commented (Aug. 5, 1954): "Underdeveloped countries with rich resources now have an object lesson in the heavy cost which must be paid by one of their number which goes berserk with fanatical nationalism with the view to bring rich resources out of Western control, so that the general population may benefit."

The Shah and his American petroleum buddies lasted in power for 26 years until 1979. At that time there was an Islamic revolution in Iran which expelled the Shah a second time -- he fled to the United States -- and also expelled the foreign oil companies from the Iranian oil fields. They have never returned to those oil fields -- and that’s why U.S. leaders hate Iran so passionately.

In 1980, the United States fought back by massive shipments of weapons of war sent to Saddam Hussein in Iraq, who initiated an eight-year war against Iran. Sixty of our Hughes MD-500 Defender helicopters and then 10 Bell helicopters were sold to Iraq. Fuel air explosive technology was exported to Iraq, although it was capable of producing bombs 10 times more lethal than conventional bombs. Equipment for the Arab Company for Detergent Chemicals (a front for chemical weapons) and bacteria samples to the Iraqi Atomic Energy Commission and the University of Baghdad (both linked to biological warfare by the CIA) were sent to Saddam for his anti-Iranian war.

Sydney Spiegel, Casper
____________________________________________________________________________________

An Excerpt :

Why does Iran dislike the United States?
Don't Panic ... Your War Questions Answered
Published 05.17.06
By Andisheh Nouraee

Back in the day, Iran and the United States were great pals.

In 1955, Iran joined the Cold War on the U.S.'s side by hitching itself to the Middle East Treaty Organization (later known as the Central Treaty Organization). METO was a sort of Southwest Asian equivalent of NATO.

In 1971, Iran's ruler, Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, threw a $100 million party to celebrate 2,500 years of Iranian monarchy. The menu included one ton of caviar, 5,000 bottles of vintage wine and champagne, and a roasted peacock stuffed with foie gras. U.S. Vice President Spiro Agnew was an honored guest.

In 1973, when Arab nations stopped selling oil to the United States to retaliate against American support for Israel during that year's Arab-Israeli War, Iran kindly (and quite profitably) increased its oil exports to America.

Because the Arab oil embargo quadrupled the price of crude oil, Iran suddenly found itself rolling in some serious dough while the U.S. economy was struggling. Good pal to America that it was, Iran kindly began sending some of the money back here by becoming the largest foreign customer of the U.S.'s high-tech weapons industry.

By the late 1970s, the U.S. and Iran were so BFF that President Carter praised Iran as "an island of stability in one of the most troubled areas of the world."

So where did it all go wrong? How did Iran and the U.S. go from peacock-leftover-sandwich-eating bosom buddies to archenemies?

The answer is hidden in what I've written above. I'll give you a hint. It's a three-letter word that starts with "O" and ends with "L."

"Owl?"

Guess again.

"Oil?"

Correct.

Just like me and that kid across the street who was the first person in the neighborhood to get an Atari, the United States wasn't really good friends with Iran. The U.S. was friends with Iran's stuff, mostly its oil.

Iran still sits atop some of the largest oil and natural gas deposits in the world. Western powers have been jockeying for power and influence in Iran ever since it became clear that oil was replacing coal as the most favored fuel of Western nations.

During the first half of the century, it was Russia and the United Kingdom that did most of the jockeying. During WWII, the Soviet Union and Great Britain even invaded Iran to ensure the country remained in the Allied camp. Iran was important both for its oil and because it provided a safe supply route for American war materials to reach the Soviets.

When they invaded, Russia and the U.K. exiled Iran's king, Reza Shah Pahlavi, and replaced him with his peacock-snackin' son, Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, who was just 20. Young, inexperienced and ineffectual, Mohammed Reza Pahlavi wasn't very good at standing up for his country's interests. Even though the U.K.'s power and influence went into steep decline after WWII, Pahlavi was unable and/or unwilling to stand up to the British-controlled Anglo-Iranian Oil Company that was, for all practical purposes, stealing Iran's oil.

Someone did stand up to British exploitation, though. His name was Mohammed Mossadegh. A popular nationalist and government minister, Mossadegh was elected prime minister by Iran's parliament in 1951 for the express purpose of asserting control over Iran's oil resources. Iran's government had taken control of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company's domestic assets.

The Brits rather enjoyed not paying market value for Iranian oil, so they tried hard to bully Iran into reversing its action. They blockaded Iranian shipping. They also lobbied the United States for help in toppling Mossadegh. President Harry Truman declined. His successor, Dwight Eisenhower, accepted, and in 1953 Eisenhower dispatched the then-young CIA to carry out some regime change.

In the U.S.-engineered coup that ensued, Mossadegh -- Iran's only genuinely popular and relatively fairly elected democratic leader -- was toppled and arrested. After a brief period of exile, Pahlavi returned to power, and his ensuing autocracy was marked by greed, incompetence and cruelty. In 1979, decades of pent-up nationalism, hunger for democracy, and rural resentment of Pahlavi's Western ways exploded into a revolution that brought the current religious extremists to power.

Given all of the above, if you were Iranian, how would you feel about the United States?