Friday, January 30, 2009

Slumdog Millionaire - My Personal Review




Yesterday i had the pleasure of viewing one of the most beautifully crafted movies in my lifetime. It was the much critically acclaimed SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE, currently nominated for 10 Oscars for this year's academy awards presentation including best picture.

What evokes me about this movie was how too good to be true things can be, especially when the odds are against so many things to a simplistic group of people out there helmed by deplorable background made worse by their tragic stories waiting to be told to the outside world. As what the South African based Indian diplomat, Mr Vikas Swarup whose Q & A novel was based on, remarked that this story is just fiction ,but i see the story as a magical revelation and example of a typical Indian facts of life. There is always more life's essence personified in bad and poor times i supposed.

What struck me most is the sincere portrayal of hardship and poverty earned by its dwellers of a third world country. Although India is a an awakening superpower with its huge population as a sure source of capital to support it whether socially or economically, i find it very distressful to see the true colors of life's agony and desperation as depicted quite vividly in the film.I have not been to India personally but through the years i have heard and seen(through the media )about the unbalanced social decree of humanity in that part of the world truly afflict my heartstrings in the most unfeigned manner.- hunger,poor sanitation, overcrowding,crime & corruption - all of which seem to denote such common third world plagues and malaises.

It was about how adults of the underworld took advantage of helpless miserly children to achieve their evil means, immersed and tainted against a slum community background that was heavy and brutal in life's shortcomings where nobody cares and everyone led an ostensibly honest and carefree life. You cannot trust anyone who is kind to you because they will implicate your life so as to lead their very own.

True also, as what the author mentioned over CNN today as interviewed by Kristie Lu Stout that it was not important if a person is uneducated as long as he is street smart and witty. SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE is also about self dignity. A person will go to great lengths and strengths just to achieve his far fetched dreams using all means of sacrifices and lifeline support.The latter goes on with a little bit of luck.

I love this movie because it speaks volume about human sufferings in a develop society although the author may not really have live through that sort of life to relive each of the characters embodiment. The backdrop of events happening here could even be happening in the other places like Latin America, Africa and even the Philippines or Indonesia for that matter.India's popular reputation as a call centre hub in this global world and their knack for reality TV shows add to a more realistic approach about the world of glamor which everyone likes to be part of in contrast to the poverty humdrum and the shadows they lived in.

The heroine(Freida Pinto)in the movie does not justify the compatibility of the hero's (Dev Patel) supposedly strong willed character and naturally genuine acting experience. According to Danny Boyle, the movie director the cast were roped in from the normal stable of actors in the Bollywood scene. I remembered the actor (Irrfan Khan)who played the chief inspector role. He was also featured in another movie ( The Namesake) about a professional Indian citizen who migrated to the US searching for the American Dream and who later brought along his wife who had to accept and face the cross cultural differences in order to raise her own family singlehandedly soon after his own death.
The music by AR Rahman is undoubtedly well suited to the scenes depicted in this fast moving teeth clenching and sometimes heart wrenching story.I hope the SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE will win an oscar for Best Picture even if the other 9 nominations fail to achieve.And maybe it was written for such a success.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

'Slumdog' child actors to get new homes
Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:25:00 AM PT, Reuters


MUMBAI (Reuters Life!) – The two main child actors from "Slumdog Millionaire" are to receive new homes from the authorities after the small-budget movie swept the Oscars, winning eight Academy Awards.

The Mumbai homes will go to Rubina Ali and Azharuddin Ismail, who played the young roles of the movie's central characters, Latika and Salim, in the rags-to-riches romance about a poor Indian boy competing for love and money on a TV game show.

"These two children have brought laurels to the country, and we have been told that they live in slums, which cannot even be classified as housing," said Gautam Chatterjee, head of the state-run Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority.

Authorities did not say where the home would be only that there would be apartments and near a "prime location."

Ali, 8, currently lives in a tiny hovel in a rubbish strewn slum near railway tracks in India's financial hub. Ismail sleeps under a polythene sheet-covered roof in the same slum. Open sewers run nearby and both homes have no running water.

The movie, based in Mumbai, took home eight awards from the Oscars including best picture and best director for Britain's Danny Boyle.

But in the leadup to Sunday's Oscars, the movie's success around the globe was overshadowed by objections in India to its name which some Indians find offensive, its depiction of the lives of impoverished Indians, and the treatment of the cast.

There was an outcry after pictures emerged of the child stars living in squalor despite the $15 million movie earning about $100 million since its North American release last November.

But since the Oscars, India's media has been caught in a patriotic frenzy and politicians have jumped on the bandwagon to praise Indians involved in the film.

Boyle and producer Christian Colson have flatly rejected claims of exploiting children for the movie.

They said the children were paid above local Indian wages and enrolled in school for the first time with a fund set up to pay for their education, medical emergencies and "basic living costs."

Fox Searchlight Pictures, the 20th Century Film Fox studio behind the film, paid for visas, travel and accommodation for nine children to fly to Los Angeles for the Oscars.

_____________________________________________________________________________________
MORE SLUMDOG SUCCESSES

"Jai Ho," the rousing finale from Slumdog Millionaire, is shaping up as a hit. A.R. Rahman's original soundtrack version of the song (featuring M.I.A) re-enters Hot Digital Songs at #76, while an English-language rendition by Rahman and the Pussycat Dolls titled "Jai Ho! (You Are My Destiny)" is on deck and will debut next week. (It enters the Hot 100 at #100 this week and will make a huge jump next week.) The Slumdog soundtrack rebounds from #48 to #22 on The Billboard 200 in the immediate aftermath of the Academy Awards, where the movie amassed eight awards, including Best Picture. The album sold 21,000 copies, most of them (12,000) digitally. The sales tracking week ended Sunday night, the same night as the Oscar telecast. So there's every reason to think that the album will climb much higher. If Slumdog breaks into the top 10, it will become the first soundtrack to an Oscar-winning Best Picture to reach the top 10 only after the Oscar telecast since Rocky 32 years ago. Just how high will Slumdog go? Raising Sand, the Robert Plant/Alison Krauss collaboration, vaulted from #69 to #2 last week in the wake of winning five Grammys. Slumdog may well pull off a similar surge next week, especially given the success of the film, which will top the $100 million mark at the box-office this weekend.

"Jai Ho" is the third Oscar Best Song winner that was introduced in a foreign language. The song, in Hindi, follows "Al Otro Lado Del Rio," sung in Spanish by Jorge Drexler in the 2004 film The Motorcycle Diaries, and "Never On Sunday," sung in Greek by Melina Mercouri in the 1960 movie of the same name. Proving there is nothing new under the sun, the English-language rendition of of "Jai Ho" by Rahman and the Pussycat Dolls echoes the Chordettes' English-language cover version of "Never On Sunday" 48 years ago. The female group, best known for the 1954 charmer "Mr. Sandman," had a top 15 hit with the song in the summer of 1961.


____________________________________________________________________________________



'Slumdog' shifts the rhythm of the Oscars
by Hunter Gros, February 26, 2009

Few mainstream movies have the ability to transport a western audience and emotionally invest them in a world with different cultural values. “Slumdog Millionaire” is the exception, providing the audience a unique opportunity to place themselves among the issues plaguing most developing countries, religious violence, gangs, poverty and mountains of garbage.

The film follows the story of protagonist Jamal, played by Dev Patel, and his dream run on the Indian version of “Who Wants to be a Millionaire?” The catch is his background as an uneducated member of the Mumbai slums. The authorities become skeptical as to how he could possibly know the answer to every question.
In his blog, Arindam Chaudhuri, editor-in-chief of The The Sunday Indian, heavily criticized the film.

“Don’t see ‘Slumdog Millionaire.’ It sucks…all in all, the film is nothing but an endorsement of an erstwhile imperial mindset of the West and its blinkered vision of India.”

"Slumdog Millionare” certainly has a semi-western spin, as the hero and heroine wind up together in typical Hollywood fashion. The concept of such true love is almost taboo in India, as 90 percent of marriages are arranged. What the movie lacks in factual context is made up for by director Danny Boyle’s intention to introduce India to a large western audience.

After watching the film, many comment on the piles of garbage, the houses stacked upon each other and the outhouses as if these were simple aesthetics to increase the dilapidated atmosphere. Sadly, this depiction of India is real. Having just returned from a winter term course in India, I applaud the Boyle for placing the audiences in Mumbai and Uttar Padesh.

Perhaps the best thing this movie offers audiences is a small peek into India’s often-ignored Bollywood, the largest film industry in the world. Bollywood films are at times more like attending a circus than watching a film. The over-the-top action, dance scenes and random songs bring a lighthearted, theatrical element missing in many western films. Yes, Bollywood films are cheesy, but they’re also entertaining. Isn’t that why everyone goes to see a movie?

It was a ceremony where the record-breaking, critically acclaimed “Dark Knight” wasn’t nominated for Best Picture and the Academy favored veteran actor Sean Penn less for his work in “Milk” and more for his body of work.

“Slumdog Millionaire” escaped from western stereotypes and made anyone who worked on the film feel like 20 million rupees. “Slumdog” walked away with awards for best adapted screenplay, cinematography, sound mixing, editing, score, song, directing and best picture.

The ceremony was not the most entertaining show (the sound was horrible throughout). But seeing the joy of all those who won for “Slumdog” gave the public the small hope that the Oscars are about more than politics and narrow viewpoints.

"As the Arabs see the Jews" His Majesty King Abdullah, The American Magazine November, 1947






I would like to thank a friend of mine for sending this article to me regarding the Arab Isreaeli Conflict which was an excerpt from the Royal Jordanian family website - Happy Reading !!!



"As the Arabs see the Jews" - His Majesty King Abdullah,
The American Magazine
November, 1947



Summary

This fascinating essay, written by King Hussein’s grandfather King Abdullah, appeared in the United States six months before the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. In the article, King Abdullah disputes the mistaken view that Arab opposition to Zionism (and later the state of Israel) is because of longstanding religious or ethnic hatred. He notes that Jews and Muslims enjoyed a long history of peaceful coexistence in the Middle East, and that Jews have historically suffered far more at the hands of Christian Europe. Pointing to the tragedy of the holocaust that Jews suffered during World War II, the monarch asks why America and Europe are refusing to accept more than a token handful of Jewish immigrants and refugees. It is unfair, he argues, to make Palestine, which is innocent of anti-Semitism, pay for the crimes of Europe. King Abdullah also asks how Jews can claim a historic right to Palestine, when Arabs have been the overwhelming majority there for nearly 1300 uninterrupted years? The essay ends on an ominous note, warning of dire consequences if a peaceful solution cannot be found to protect the rights of the indigenous Arabs of Palestine.



"As the Arabs see the Jews"
His Majesty King Abdullah,
The American Magazine
November, 1947

I am especially delighted to address an American audience, for the tragic problem of Palestine will never be solved without American understanding, American sympathy, American support.

So many billions of words have been written about Palestine—perhaps more than on any other subject in history—that I hesitate to add to them. Yet I am compelled to do so, for I am reluctantly convinced that the world in general, and America in particular, knows almost nothing of the true case for the Arabs.

We Arabs follow, perhaps far more than you think, the press of America. We are frankly disturbed to find that for every word printed on the Arab side, a thousand are printed on the Zionist side.

There are many reasons for this. You have many millions of Jewish citizens interested in this question. They are highly vocal and wise in the ways of publicity. There are few Arab citizens in America, and we are as yet unskilled in the technique of modern propaganda.

The results have been alarming for us. In your press we see a horrible caricature and are told it is our true portrait. In all justice, we cannot let this pass by default.

Our case is quite simple: For nearly 2,000 years Palestine has been almost 100 per cent Arab. It is still preponderantly Arab today, in spite of enormous Jewish immigration. But if this immigration continues we shall soon be outnumbered—a minority in our home.

Palestine is a small and very poor country, about the size of your state of Vermont. Its Arab population is only about 1,200,000. Already we have had forced on us, against our will, some 600,000 Zionist Jews. We are threatened with many hundreds of thousands more.

Our position is so simple and natural that we are amazed it should even be questioned. It is exactly the same position you in America take in regard to the unhappy European Jews. You are sorry for them, but you do not want them in your country.

We do not want them in ours, either. Not because they are Jews, but because they are foreigners. We would not want hundreds of thousands of foreigners in our country, be they Englishmen or Norwegians or Brazilians or whatever.

Think for a moment: In the last 25 years we have had one third of our entire population forced upon us. In America that would be the equivalent of 45,000,000 complete strangers admitted to your country, over your violent protest, since 1921. How would you have reacted to that?

Because of our perfectly natural dislike of being overwhelmed in our own homeland, we are called blind nationalists and heartless anti-Semites. This charge would be ludicrous were it not so dangerous.

No people on earth have been less "anti-Semitic" than the Arabs. The persecution of the Jews has been confined almost entirely to the Christian nations of the West. Jews, themselves, will admit that never since the Great Dispersion did Jews develop so freely and reach such importance as in Spain when it was an Arab possession. With very minor exceptions, Jews have lived for many centuries in the Middle East, in complete peace and friendliness with their Arab neighbours.

Damascus, Baghdad, Beirut and other Arab centres have always contained large and prosperous Jewish colonies. Until the Zionist invasion of Palestine began, these Jews received the most generous treatment—far, far better than in Christian Europe. Now, unhappily, for the first time in history, these Jews are beginning to feel the effects of Arab resistance to the Zionist assault. Most of them are as anxious as Arabs to stop it. Most of these Jews who have found happy homes among us resent, as we do, the coming of these strangers.

I was puzzled for a long time about the odd belief which apparently persists in America that Palestine has somehow "always been a Jewish land." Recently an American I talked to cleared up this mystery. He pointed out that the only things most Americans know about Palestine are what they read in the Bible. It was a Jewish land in those days, they reason, and they assume it has always remained so.

Nothing could be farther from the truth. It is absurd to reach so far back into the mists of history to argue about who should have Palestine today, and I apologise for it. Yet the Jews do this, and I must reply to their "historic claim." I wonder if the world has ever seen a stranger sight than a group of people seriously pretending to claim a land because their ancestors lived there some 2,000 years ago!

If you suggest that I am biased, I invite you to read any sound history of the period and verify the facts.

Such fragmentary records as we have indicate that the Jews were wandering nomads from Iraq who moved to southern Turkey, came south to Palestine, stayed there a short time, and then passed to Egypt, where they remained about 400 years. About 1300 BC (according to your calendar) they left Egypt and gradually conquered most—but not all—of the inhabitants of Palestine.

It is significant that the Philistines—not the Jews—gave their name to the country: "Palestine" is merely the Greek form of "Philistia."

Only once, during the empire of David and Solomon, did the Jews ever control nearly—but not all—the land which is today Palestine. This empire lasted only 70 years, ending in 926 BC. Only 250 years later the Kingdom of Judah had shrunk to a small province around Jerusalem, barely a quarter of modern Palestine.

In 63 BC the Jews were conquered by Roman Pompey, and never again had even the vestige of independence. The Roman Emperor Hadrian finally wiped them out about 135 AD. He utterly destroyed Jerusalem, rebuilt under another name, and for hundreds of years no Jew was permitted to enter it. A handful of Jews remained in Palestine but the vast majority were killed or scattered to other countries, in the Diaspora, or the Great Dispersion. From that time Palestine ceased to be a Jewish country, in any conceivable sense.

This was 1,815 years ago, and yet the Jews solemnly pretend they still own Palestine! If such fantasy were allowed, how the map of the world would dance about!

Italians might claim England, which the Romans held so long. England might claim France, "homeland" of the conquering Normans. And the French Normans might claim Norway, where their ancestors originated. And incidentally, we Arabs might claim Spain, which we held for 700 years.

Many Mexicans might claim Spain, "homeland" of their forefathers. They might even claim Texas, which was Mexican until 100 years ago. And suppose the American Indians claimed the "homeland" of which they were the sole, native, and ancient occupants until only some 450 years ago!

I am not being facetious. All these claims are just as valid—or just as fantastic—as the Jewish "historic connection" with Palestine. Most are more valid.

In any event, the great Moslem expansion about 650 AD finally settled things. It dominated Palestine completely. From that day on, Palestine was solidly Arabic in population, language, and religion. When British armies entered the country during the last war, they found 500,000 Arabs and only 65,000 Jews.

If solid, uninterrupted Arab occupation for nearly 1,300 years does not make a country "Arab", what does?

The Jews say, and rightly, that Palestine is the home of their religion. It is likewise the birthplace of Christianity, but would any Christian nation claim it on that account? In passing, let me say that the Christian Arabs—and there are many hundreds of thousands of them in the Arab World—are in absolute agreement with all other Arabs in opposing the Zionist invasion of Palestine.

May I also point out that Jerusalem is, after Mecca and Medina, the holiest place in Islam. In fact, in the early days of our religion, Moslems prayed toward Jerusalem instead of Mecca.

The Jewish "religious claim" to Palestine is as absurd as the "historic claim." The Holy Places, sacred to three great religions, must be open to all, the monopoly of none. Let us not confuse religion and politics.

We are told that we are inhumane and heartless because do not accept with open arms the perhaps 200,000 Jews in Europe who suffered so frightfully under Nazi cruelty, and who even now—almost three years after war’s end—still languish in cold, depressing camps.

Let me underline several facts. The unimaginable persecution of the Jews was not done by the Arabs: it was done by a Christian nation in the West. The war which ruined Europe and made it almost impossible for these Jews to rehabilitate themselves was fought by the Christian nations of the West. The rich and empty portions of the earth belong, not to the Arabs, but to the Christian nations of the West.

And yet, to ease their consciences, these Christian nations of the West are asking Palestine—a poor and tiny Moslem country of the East—to accept the entire burden. "We have hurt these people terribly," cries the West to the East. "Won’t you please take care of them for us?"

We find neither logic nor justice in this. Are we therefore "cruel and heartless nationalists"?

We are a generous people: we are proud that "Arab hospitality" is a phrase famous throughout the world. We are a humane people: no one was shocked more than we by the Hitlerite terror. No one pities the present plight of the desperate European Jews more than we.

But we say that Palestine has already sheltered 600,000 refugees. We believe that is enough to expect of us—even too much. We believe it is now the turn of the rest of the world to accept some of them.

I will be entirely frank with you. There is one thing the Arab world simply cannot understand. Of all the nations of the earth, America is most insistent that something be done for these suffering Jews of Europe. This feeling does credit to the humanity for which America is famous, and to that glorious inscription on your Statue of Liberty.

And yet this same America—the richest, greatest, most powerful nation the world has ever known—refuses to accept more than a token handful of these same Jews herself!

I hope you will not think I am being bitter about this. I have tried hard to understand that mysterious paradox, and I confess I cannot. Nor can any other Arab.

Perhaps you have been informed that "the Jews in Europe want to go to no other place except Palestine."

This myth is one of the greatest propaganda triumphs of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, the organisation which promotes with fanatic zeal the emigration to Palestine. It is a subtle half-truth, thus doubly dangerous.

The astounding truth is that nobody on earth really knows where these unfortunate Jews really want to go!

You would think that in so grave a problem, the American, British, and other authorities responsible for the European Jews would have made a very careful survey, probably by vote, to find out where each Jew actually wants to go. Amazingly enough this has never been done! The Jewish Agency has prevented it.

Some time ago the American Military Governor in Germany was asked at a press conference how he was so certain that all Jews there wanted to go to Palestine. His answer was simple: "My Jewish advisors tell me so." He admitted no poll had ever been made. Preparations were indeed begun for one, but the Jewish Agency stepped in to stop it.

The truth is that the Jews in German camps are now subjected to a Zionist pressure campaign which learned much from the Nazi terror. It is dangerous for a Jew to say that he would rather go to some other country, not Palestine. Such dissenters have been severely beaten, and worse.

Not long ago, in Palestine, nearly 1,000 Austrian Jews informed the international refugee organisation that they would like to go back to Austria, and plans were made to repatriate them.

The Jewish Agency heard of this, and exerted enough political pressure to stop it. It would be bad propaganda for Zionism if Jews began leaving Palestine. The nearly 1,000 Austrian are still there, against their will.

The fact is that most of the European Jews are Western in culture and outlook, entirely urban in experience and habits. They cannot really have their hearts set on becoming pioneers in the barren, arid, cramped land which is Palestine.

One thing, however, is undoubtedly true. As matters stand now, most refugee Jews in Europe would, indeed, vote for Palestine, simply because they know no other country will have them.

If you or I were given a choice between a near-prison camp for the rest of our lives—or Palestine—we would both choose Palestine, too.

But open up any other alternative to them—give them any other choice, and see what happens!

No poll, however, will be worth anything unless the nations of the earth are willing to open their doors—just a little—to the Jews. In other words, if in such a poll a Jew says he wants to go to Sweden, Sweden must be willing to accept him. If he votes for America, you must let him come in.

Any other kind of poll would be a farce. For the desperate Jew, this is no idle testing of opinion: this is a grave matter of life or death. Unless he is absolutely sure that his vote means something, he will always vote for Palestine, so as not to risk his bird in the hand for one in the bush.

In any event, Palestine can accept no more. The 65,000 Jews in Palestine in 1918 have jumped to 600,000 today. We Arabs have increased, too, but not by immigration. The Jews were then a mere 11 per cent of our population. Today they are one third of it.

The rate of increase has been terrifying. In a few more years—unless stopped now—it will overwhelm us, and we shall be an important minority in our own home.

Surely the rest of the wide world is rich enough and generous enough to find a place for 200,000 Jews—about one third the number that tiny, poor Palestine has already sheltered. For the rest of the world, it is hardly a drop in the bucket. For us it means national suicide.

We are sometimes told that since the Jews came to Palestine, the Arab standard of living has improved. This is a most complicated question. But let us even assume, for the argument, that it is true. We would rather be a bit poorer, and masters of our own home. Is this unnatural?

The sorry story of the so-called "Balfour Declaration," which started Zionist immigration into Palestine, is too complicated to repeat here in detail. It is grounded in broken promises to the Arabs—promises made in cold print which admit no denying.

We utterly deny its validity. We utterly deny the right of Great Britain to give away Arab land for a "national home" for an entirely foreign people.

Even the League of Nations sanction does not alter this. At the time, not a single Arab state was a member of the League. We were not allowed to say a word in our own defense.

I must point out, again in friendly frankness, that America was nearly as responsible as Britain for this Balfour Declaration. President Wilson approved it before it was issued, and the American Congress adopted it word for word in a joint resolution on 30th June, 1922.

In the 1920s, Arabs were annoyed and insulted by Zionist immigration, but not alarmed by it. It was steady, but fairly small, as even the Zionist founders thought it would remain. Indeed for some years, more Jews left Palestine than entered it—in 1927 almost twice as many.

But two new factors, entirely unforeseen by Britain or the League or America or the most fervent Zionist, arose in the early thirties to raise the immigration to undreamed heights. One was the World Depression; the second the rise of Hitler.

In 1932, the year before Hitler came to power, only 9,500 Jews came to Palestine. We did not welcome them, but we were not afraid that, at that rate, our solid Arab majority would ever be in danger.

But the next year—the year of Hitler—it jumped to 30,000! In 1934 it was 42,000! In 1935 it reached 61,000!

It was no longer the orderly arrival of idealist Zionists. Rather, all Europe was pouring its frightened Jews upon us. Then, at last, we, too, became frightened. We knew that unless this enormous influx stopped, we were, as Arabs, doomed in our Palestine homeland. And we have not changed our minds.

I have the impression that many Americans believe the trouble in Palestine is very remote from them, that America had little to do with it, and that your only interest now is that of a humane bystander.

I believe that you do not realise how directly you are, as a nation, responsible in general for the whole Zionist move and specifically for the present terrorism. I call this to your attention because I am certain that if you realise your responsibility you will act fairly to admit it and assume it.

Quite aside from official American support for the "National Home" of the Balfour Declaration, the Zionist settlements in Palestine would have been almost impossible, on anything like the current scale, without American money. This was contributed by American Jewry in an idealistic effort to help their fellows.

The motive was worthy: the result were disastrous. The contributions were by private individuals, but they were almost entirely Americans, and, as a nation, only America can answer for it.

The present catastrophe may be laid almost entirely at your door. Your government, almost alone in the world, is insisting on the immediate admission of 100,000 more Jews into Palestine—to be followed by countless additional ones. This will have the most frightful consequences in bloody chaos beyond anything ever hinted at in Palestine before.

It is your press and political leadership, almost alone in the world, who press this demand. It is almost entirely American money which hires or buys the "refugee ships" that steam illegally toward Palestine: American money which pays their crews. The illegal immigration from Europe is arranged by the Jewish Agency, supported almost entirely by American funds. It is American dollars which support the terrorists, which buy the bullets and pistols that kill British soldiers—your allies—and Arab citizens—your friends.

We in the Arab world were stunned to hear that you permit open advertisements in newspapers asking for money to finance these terrorists, to arm them openly and deliberately for murder. We could not believe this could really happen in the modern world. Now we must believe it: we have seen the advertisements with our own eyes.

I point out these things because nothing less than complete frankness will be of use. The crisis is too stark for mere polite vagueness which means nothing.

I have the most complete confidence in the fair-mindedness and generosity of the American public. We Arabs ask no favours. We ask only that you know the full truth, not half of it. We ask only that when you judge the Palestine question, you put yourselves in our place.

What would your answer be if some outside agency told you that you must accept in America many millions of utter strangers in your midst—enough to dominate your country—merely because they insisted on going to America, and because their forefathers had once lived there some 2,000 years ago?

Our answer is the same.

And what would be your action if, in spite of your refusal, this outside agency began forcing them on you?

Ours will be the same.

_________________________________________________________________________________

ABOUT KING ABDULLLAH 1

(1882-1951) Ruler of Jordan 1921-1951, altogether 30 years. He was emir of Transjordan 1921-1946; king of Transjordan/Jordan 1946-1951.
Abdullah was a leader of the old school, great at securing power and taking control over territories. Both his claim on Jordan and later on the West Bank, resulted in internationally recognized solutions. He never managed, however, to achieve his ultimate goal: The formation of Greater Syria comprising Jordan, Syria and Iraq under a Hashemite dynasty
On internal matters, he did little to advance modern state structures. But he was a moderate politician, and positive to forming close ties with Western countries.

Biography
1882: Born in Mecca, as son of Sharif Husayn ibn Ali, the ruler of Hijaz.
1908: Abdullah's father is released from house arrest in Istanbul.
1912: Abdullah becomes the representative for Hijaz in the Ottoman parliament.
1916 July: Joins his father in the revolt against the Ottoman supremacy.
1917: When his father declares himself King of Hijaz, Abdullah becomes his Foreign Minister.
1921 January: Abdullah's forces enters the eastern part of the British Middle Eastern mandate, and sets up a government ruling from Amman.
— July: The British offers recognition of Abdullah's regime if he accepts British supremacy. He accepts after demanding that there would be no Jewish immigration into his area.
1923 May 25: Abdullah declares Transjordan independent.
1928 April: Proclaims a constitution, giving all power to the king who would act through a legislative council.
1946 May: The British mandate of Transjordan ends, and the independent state called the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan is formed with Abdullah as king.
1948 May: Abdullah becomes the commander-in-chief of hte united Arab forces attacking the newly formed state of Israel. Abdullah's army soon takes control over some parts of Palestine, corresponding to the are now known in full as West Bank.
1950: Abdullah enters into a non-aggression pact with Israel after clandestine meetings.
— April: He officially annexes the West Bank as part of Jordan.
1951 July 20: Abdullah is shot dead by a Palestinian in East Jerusalem, as a retaliation for his policy of not aiding the Palestinians in a total war against Israel. He is succeeded by his mentally sick son, Talal.

© Copyright 1996-2009 LookLex Ltd. All rights reserved
By: Tore Kjeilen

50 Years Ago This Week, The Day The Music Died - An Excerpt


Excerpt from Tipton Conservative USA :


50 Years Ago This Week, The Day The Music Died
by Stuart Clark · January 29, 2009


“Would you like to hear the song that I made famous?”

Those words were spoken by Ritchie Valens to Esther Wenck of Tipton 29 years ago when he, Buddy Holly and J.P. Richardson, the “Big Bopper,” made an unscheduled stop at the Meet and Eat Restaurant in Tipton Jan. 30, 1959.

Four days later, all 3 were dead, victims of an airplane crash north of Clear Lake.

The death of the 3 rock ‘n roll stars stunned the nation and Feb. 3, 1959 be-came known as “The day the music died.”

Yet, most people in Tipton had no idea who the young entertainers were, even though they had rocketed to the top of the charts with songs like “Peggy Sue,” “Donna,” “That’ll Be the Day” and “Chantilly Lace.”

Although it has now been 50 years since the group was forced to stop in Tipton be-cause of a malfunctioning bus heater, those who saw them remember the day well. Ever since the entertainers’ deaths, they have felt a connection to the legend of the singers.

The recent movie “La Bamba” was about the life of Ritchie Valens, whose song “Donna” had sold a million records.

According to George Horton, a Buddy Holly memorabilia collector from Vining, Ia., the entertainers were traveling from Daven-port to Ft. Dodge Jan. 30, 1959. They de-cided to stop in Tipton because the heater on their bus wasn’t working and it was a typically cold winter January day in Iowa.

A short story in the Feb. 5, 1959 Tipton Advertiser was headlined “THREE ROCK ‘N’ ROLL STAR PERFORMERS VISIT HERE; KILLED IN PLANE CRASH.”

The story said Holly, Valens and Richardson had stopped at Gaul Motor Co. to have their bus repaired. “While in Tipton they entertained several local people who happened to be about the Meet and Eat and McGregor Shell Station. They were clean-cut attractive young men.”

Gene Sissel of Tipton was one of the first people to see the recording artists when they stopped here. Employed in the parts de-partment at Gaul Motor Co. in 1959, he re-members the day well.

“Their bus heater was frozen,” he said, “and the band was right up front [in the Gaul building]. I remember one of the guys took a tractor seat off the parts counter and got on the floor with it and said he was a reindeer salesman. I guess he thought it was pretty cold here.”

Sissel said nobody really knew who the young men were, but they knew they played in a band. “They were very nice and they never acted like they thought they were real important.”

He called news of their deaths 4 days later “quite a shock.”

Al Hendricks is retired now, but he was the owner of Al’s Meet & Eat back in 1959. He was flipping hamburgers in the kitchen of his small restaurant on Cedar Street when the entertainers came in.

“I didn’t pay much attention to them,” he said. “They were just customers as far as I was concerned. I didn’t know at first that they were members of a band. I didn’t follow Buddy Holly’s music.”

“I remember that they sat down and then noticed the juke box. Somebody put money in and played one of his own records and sang along with it. I knew then that they were stars, because his voice sounded the same as the record.”

Hendricks said it was sometime around 10 a.m. Jan. 30 when the young men walked into the restaurant and he thinks they just had coffee or pop to drink.

“The waitresses were excited,” he said, “and they felt very bad when they were killed. I felt kind of bad, too. It all came as kind of a big surprise.”

Esther Wenck remembers Valens wearing an iridescent jacket, which changed color from black to brown.

“When they told me they were famous singers, I thought they were kidding,” she said. She doesn’t remember who accompa-nied the 3 singers into the restaurant, but she said the small building filled up.

Forty-four years old at the time, Wenck said the rock ‘n roll Holly, Valens and Richardson played wasn’t her kind of music. However, she said she felt especially bad when they were killed, because she hadn’t believed them when they first said they were big time stars.

Retracing the route of the musicians through downtown Tipton, it is known that the young men stopped in at least 4 busi-ness places, including T & M Clothing, which was then owned by George Tevis and the late Glen Mosher.

“I believe Bob McGregor [at the McGregor Shell station] sent them down here,” Tevis recalled last week. “I remember they bought a lot of clothes and they paid cash. They had all kinds of money.”

Tevis said the young men spent between 10 and 20 minutes in the clothing store. He said his clearest memory of that day 50 years ago was one of the men taking a pair of pants and putting them on behind the sales counter, bypassing the dressing room.

“They were a good bunch of boys,” Tevis said.

McGregor, the man who sent the rock ‘ roll stars to the store, said he remembers the men coming into his station a couple of times during their 2 1/2 hour stop here.

“We talked to the guys, but really didn’t know much about them,” he said. “We talked about their records, about the weather and where they were going.”

“I think about that day every year now,” McGregor said. “We could hardly believe it when they were killed. We had just seen them days before.”

“It was quite exciting when they were here.”

The singers were not interviewed when they were in Tipton, which was another in-dication that they were simply not well known among Tipton residents, especially those over 30.

H.E. Clark, publisher of the Tipton Con-servative and editor of the newspaper at the time, said nobody at the paper knew who Buddy Holly was until after the plane crash.

The following editorial appeared in The Conservative Feb. 5, 1959:

Dig These Squares . . .

It is somewhat embarrassing to realize that you have become old and are also “a square.” The case of the late Buddy Holly is convincing evidence that we don’t “dig” this modern music and have apparently lost communication with the younger generation.

It was shortly after noon Jan. 30 when a call came to The Conservative that there was a celebrity in town and that it might be well for somebody to have a talk with him.

“Who is it?”

The answer was Buddy Holly, but not be-ing in tune with the latest in music, the name didn’t register. As a matter of fact the name even came through wrong, as Buddy “Holliday.”

Being moderately curious, we checked with the boys in the back shop. One of them commented if it was “Doc Holliday” he might be interested and another suggested that if it was “Judy Holliday” we would all go inter-view her.

It was a busy afternoon and the celebrity got lost in the shuffle.

It wasn’t until 5 p.m. Feb. 2, about 20 hours after Holly was killed in a plane crash north of Clear Lake that it finally got through to us who the celebrity was. His relative importance was shown in the ban-ner headlines of his death in the daily newspapers. Still being curious we checked the front and back shop for the second time. It was something of a relief to find that no-body had ever heard of Buddy Holly until that night.

But next time somebody calls and says that they have a celebrity, there will be no questions asked—we’ll go out and talk to him.

H.E.C.

Buddy Holly, Ritchie Valens and J.P. Richardson were killed 50 years ago today, the day the music died.

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

The truth about Israel's attack on an American ship





The truth about Israel's attack on an American ship - (Compare this story with the UN Buildings bombing of 2009 Gaza )

Dear Mr. President,

Saturday, June 8, 2002 marks the 35th anniversary of probably the most shameful day in American history. That day America's banner and honor were treacherously trashed by our so-called ally, Israel. Thirty four Americans were brutally slaughtered, 172 wounded, including myself. America's most sophisticated intelligence ship was so badly damaged it had to be scrapped. Israel deliberately attacked America's virtually unarmed USS LIBERTY in international waters, knowing full well our identity, in an assault that lasted as long as the attack on Pearl Harbor. On that bright, sunny, infamous day, the LIBERTY had a large American flag flapping in the wind and 10' high I.D. markings on her hull which were clearly visible during the full six hours (6:00 A.M. to 12:00 Noon) that low-flying, slow-moving, propeller recons, distinctly marked with Stars of David, reconnoitered our ship. Overheard radio transmission of the pilots confirmed that the Israel had positively identified the LIBERTY as American.

Suddenly at 2:00 p.m., the government of Israel put a knife in the back of America. In a diabolic attempt at deception, the Israelis began the attack with unmarked jet fighters using rockets, cannons, and napalm on our unprotected ship. Then three motor torpedo boats arrived on the scene and fired 6 torpedoes at us, one hitting its mark, midship's on the starboard side, instantly blowing to bits 25 of America's finest young men. The torpedo gunmen shot at our firefighters and stretcher-bearers, using us as target practice, maiming and murdering as many of America's sons as they could.

The captain ordered us to prepare to abandon ship, as the ship was in grave danger of sinking from a torpedo hit that left a 40' x 40' hole in her. There were only 3 life rafts left that they hadn't already destroyed. We put them over the side to put as many wounded in as possible. The torpedo boats machine gunned the life rafts and sank two of them and took one aboard their boat -- no survivors were to be taken! Helicopters were overhead to board our ship with Israeli commandos at the ready to finish us off.

Responding to a S.O.S. from the LIBERTY, the USS SARATOGA launched their jets approximately 15 minutes into the vicious Israeli attack. Within minutes after the launch, incredibly and inexplicably, Washington shamefully and unconscionably recalled the jets, abandoning helpless American sailors under fire, and subjecting them to an additional two hours of barbaric Israeli bombardment and butchery.

Fortuitously, when the Israelis picked up an invalid message that U.S. help was on the way, Israeli reluctantly was forced to terminate its ongoing assault. Without that break, I would not be alive writing this letter.

Ironically, help did not arrive until 18 hours after the attack when it was only 15 minutes away. When an American rescue ship finally arrived, what they found was shocking, the LIBERTY was in shambles, death on the water. There were 821 rocket and cannon holes in her hull, thousands of 50 caliber armor-piercing bullets riddling her skin, a tunnel size torpedo cavity in her broad side, and the residue of napalm that had been dropped to burn us up. Blood and body parts were strewn across the deck. A sad, outrageous story, but unfortunately true.

The crew of the most decorated naval ship in American history was ordered to remain silent under threat of court martial, imprisonment or worse, and we all knew what worst meant. The U.S. government has never challenged the obviously phony Israeli excuse of "mistaken identity", nor have they attempted to expose the dishonorable cover-up that continues to date. Truth and America's honor were ignominiously sacrificed to provide cover for Israel's transparent lies and despicable act of perfidy.

Israel's premeditated, sneak attack on the USS LIBERTY was a direct attack on America. The disgraceful refusal of unpatriotic American governmental officials of dubious allegiance to defend America and come to the aid of brave Americans under attack can only be characterized as treasonous.

Mr. President, on behalf of the courageous crew of the USS LIBERTY, dead and alive, I respectfully request that you commission a presidential panel to finally investigate the attack and cover-up of the USS LIBERTY, and report the truth to American people.

Thank you, Mr. President. God bless you! God bless America!

Respectfully,

Phillip F. Tourney, President USS LIBERTY Veterans Association

Saturday, January 24, 2009

Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Political, not Religious


by : Pamela K. Taylor
co-founder, Muslims for Progressive Values
"On Faith" panelist Pamela K. Taylor is co-founder of Muslims for Progressive Values and director of the Islamic Writers Alliance. She is a member of the national board of advisors to the Network of Spiritual Progressives, and served as co-chair of the Progressive Muslim Union for two years. Taylor is a strong supporter of the woman imam movement, which seeks the full participation of Muslim women in every aspect of life, including the pulpit. In July 2005, she became the first woman in centuries to officiate Friday prayers in a mosque when the United Muslim Association of Toronto and the Muslim Canadian Congress invited her to serve as guest imam. (This event followed a number of services, sermons and prayer sessions led by women held in private venues because no mosque agreed to host them.) In February 2006, when the former Grand Mufti of Marseilles visited Toronto, he requested that Taylor lead him in congregational prayer as an unequivocal demonstration of his support for female imams. Taylor has also been active in interfaith dialogue for 20 years, both in local initiatives and speaking at numerous conferences, universities, and churches. She received her MTS from Harvard Divinity School, and writes regularly on spiritual matters and the Islamic faith. She has essays in Nurturing Child and Adolescent Spirituality: Perspectives from the World's Religious Traditions (2006) and the forthcoming The Veil: Women Writers on Its History, Lore, and Politics (2007). She has written hundreds of articles and opinion pieces for newspapers, magazines, and journals, and is an award winning poet.




Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Political, not Religious

The premise of this week's On Faith question represents one of the most common misnomers about Muslims -- that everything we do is motivated by religion. The fact of the matter is that the Palestinian objection to Israel is not religious at all, but political.

In 2006 head of the Hamas political wing, Khalid Mish'al, wrote in The Guardian:

"Our message to the Israelis is this: we do not fight you because you belong to a certain faith or culture. Jews have lived in the Muslim world for 13 centuries in peace and harmony; they are in our religion "the people of the book" who have a covenant from God and His Messenger Muhammad (peace be upon him) to be respected and protected. Our conflict with you is not religious but political. We have no problem with Jews who have not attacked us - our problem is with those who came to our land, imposed themselves on us by force, destroyed our society and banished our people.

"We shall never recognise the right of any power to rob us of our land and deny us our national rights. We shall never recognise the legitimacy of a Zionist state created on our soil in order to atone for somebody else's sins or solve somebody else's problem. But if you are willing to accept the principle of a long-term truce, we are prepared to negotiate the terms. Hamas is extending a hand of peace to those who are truly interested in a peace based on justice."

It is not Hamas's understanding of Islam that make them hate Israel, it is the fact that they are a dispossessed people, a people who's land was given away by Europeans, stolen from them more often than not at gun point. Whole villages fled in fear of terrorist groups like the Irgun or the Stern gang, expecting to return a few days or weeks later, only to find that they never were able to go back to their houses.

I recently heard a piece on NPR about a man who had grown up in Jerusalem. He had the deed his home. His wife wore the key to the front door around her neck. They had fled the fighting in 1947, expecting to go home in a matter of days or maybe weeks, and have never been able to back to their house. Instead, a Jewish family was settled there -- without any payment, or acknowledgment that this house belonged to someone else. The man was now an old man, and the family who lived there, at first oblivious, had grown increasingly uncomfortable with what their occupancy meant. They went so far as to invite him to come visit. He cried seeing the lemon tree he had climbed in as a boy. The family was not prepared to give up the house they had called home for many years, and yet, you they felt horrible that this man's home had been essentially stolen from him, and that they were the benefactors of that theft.

This man's story is not unique -- the millions of people living in Gaza are predominantly from the area where Hamas's missiles fall. They can look across the border and see land that once belonged to their family, had been in their family often for hundreds and hundreds of years.

We Americans have a hard time relating to that -- most of us move two or three times in our childhood and then move out of our parents house when we are young adults. The emotional attachment to a family farm that has been passed down from generation to generation, that supplied the livelihood and food for that family, for eight hundred years is something we cannot begin to understand. The pain of living a few miles away from that farm, that your family fled because they feared a pogrom, and which was then occupied by people from a distant country, is unfathomable.

And, to make matters worse, we, as a nation, sit in the same position vis a vis the original owners of our lands as Israel does vis a vis the Palestinians. We expelled Native Americans from their homes -- often through extreme violence -- and pushed them into reservations where the living conditions were, and continue to be some of the worst in the country. The Indians fought back ferociously, as have the Palestinians. Atrocities were committed on both sides, as has been the case with Israel and Palestine.

As an American, my response to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is colored by that past. I see Israel doing exactly what we did to the Native Americans and I shudder.

As a Muslim, my faith teaches me to stand up for justice. In the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, justice is a tricky question. The European treatment of Jews has been horrible for centuries and centuries. The Holocaust, while taking anti-antisemitism to a new level, was a manifestation of a long-standing and deep-seated hatred. I can empathize with Jewish desires to leave behind a region that treated them the way Europeans did, though European eagerness to move their Jewish populations to somewhere, anywhere, else is reprehensible. At the same time, I empathize with the Palestinians too. As Mish'al said, why should they have to pay for the sins of the Europeans? Why shouldn't the Europeans have to pay for their own crimes?

I do not believe that the Holocaust, as horrible as it was, justifies the wholesale disenfranchisement of the Palestinian people. Being victims of one of the worst criminal acts in the history of mankind does not give you the right to victimize others. One wrong, does not justify another wrong.

At the same time, while I do believe that people have the right to defend their persons and their property, I believe that there are limits to that defense. Islam teaches justice, balance and moderation. In particular, it limits the kinds of action one can take in warfare, and militants in Palestine have clearly crossed the boundaries. While I support the Palestinian drive for self-determination, decent living conditions, and basic human rights, I cannot support some of the techniques that they have used to fight for them, especially suicide bombings, and actions that target civilians.

No doubt, there are many Palestinian Muslims who view their struggle for a place to call home in terms of religious duty -- the fight for justice is a religious struggle in as much as Islam tells us to stand up for justice. I myself see my positions on the Middle East (and pretty much everything else) as a manifestation of my faith's teaching for justice, equality, and harmony among humankind.

I believe that this issue can be resolved, that peace can be achieved, and that some day Jews and Arabs (Christian and Muslim and whatever other religions they happen to adhere to) will live together equitably in the holy land. I look at the example of South Africa. In the days of my anti-apartheid activism, I shuddered to think what was going to happen to the Afrikaners when black people took over. I was astonished and delighted at the Truth and Reconciliation process, and I believe something along those lines could work wonders in the Middle East.

_____________________________________________________________________________________



Women as Imam - excerpt from Muslim Women's League - USA


The word 'imam' as used in the Qurân means a source of guidance (e.g. Qurân 2:124). The meaning is not limited only to prayer. Thus, the leader should guide the people along the path of Islam. In other words, the role of the leader is to follow the teachings of Islam and to act as a role model.
(M.F. Osman, "The Contract for the Appointment of the Head of an Islamic State", State, Politics, and Islam, ed. Mumtaz Ahmed, 1986, p. 56).

Leading prayer is not a necessary criterion for leadership, although it may be symbolically desirable. The leader himself or herself need not actually lead prayer. The leader can delegate this function to another. Prophet Muhammad, on two occasions, assigned Ibn Umm Maktum to lead prayer in Medina. On more than one occasion Muadh would pray isha with the Prophet and when he was finished he would return to his people and, with the Prophet’s permission, he would lead them in prayer. Thus, the assumption that the leader must actually lead the prayer is not necessarily valid.
(As-Sayyid Sabiq, Fiqh us-Sunna, American Trust Publications, 1989, vol. 2, p. 57).

Several ahâdîth set forth the criteria for leading prayer: an ability to read the Qurân, knowledge of the Qurân, knowledge of the teachings of Prophet Muhammad, and being accepted by the congregation. The following hadith, related by Ahmad and Muslim and reported by Ibn Masud, states that the Prophet said: "The imam of a people should be the one who is the most versed in the Qurân. If they are equal in their recital, then the one who is most knowledgeable of the sunnah. If they are equal in the sunnah, then it is the one who migrated first. If they are equal in that, then it is the eldest. And one should not lead prayer in another’s house without permission."
(As-Sayyid Sabiq, Fiqh us-Sunna, American Trust Publications, 1989, vol. 2, p. 56).

As-Sayyid Sabiq, a renowned Islamic scholar from al-Azhar, states that the following people are prohibited from leading prayer: someone with a legitimate excuse not to pray and an incapacitated person. He further states that the following people are discouraged from leading prayer: an evildoer and someone who changes the religion. Thus, maleness was not mentioned as a criterion. Moreover As-Sayyid Sabiq states that it is preferable for a woman to lead other women in prayer and he states that Aishah used to lead the women in prayer.
(As-Sayyid Sabiq, Fiqh us-Sunna, American Trust Publications, 1989, vol. 2, p. 58).

According to Ibn Rushd, Imam al-Shafii believed that a woman could lead other women in prayer; however, both al-Tabari and Abu Thawr believed that a woman could lead both men and women in prayer.
(Fatima Mernissi, The Forgotten Queens of Islam, University of Minnesota Press, 1993, p.33 (citing Ibn Rushd, Bidaya al-Mujtahid wa Nihaya al-Muqtasid, Dar al-Fikr, vol. 1, p. 105)).

Umm Waraqa bint Abdallah, an Ansari woman who was well versed in the Qurân, was instructed by Prophet Muhammad to lead ahl dariha (ahl dariha means the people of her home where 'dar' means home and can refer to one’s residence, neighborhood, or village), which consisted of both men and women, in prayer. The "people of Umm Waraqa’s home" were so numerous that Prophet Muhammad appointed a muezzin for her. Umm Waraqa was one of the few to hand down the Qurân before it was written. Umm Waraqa wished to be known as a martyr so she asked Prophet Muhammad to allow her to participate in the Battle of Badr (624 A.D./ 2 A.H.) so that she could take care of the wounded; from that time on Prophet Muhammad referred to her as "the female martyr."
(Wiebke Walther, Women in Islam, Markus Wiener Publishing, 1981, p. 111 (citing Ibn Sad, Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir, vol. 8, p. 335).

In 699 A.D. (77 A.H.) a woman named Ghazala led her male warriors in prayer in Kufa after having controlled the city for a day. Not only did she lead Muslim men in prayer, she recited the two longest chapters in the Qurân during that prayer. Thus, although the practice of women leading prayer is not commonly accepted, one cannot simply conclude that it is prohibited without first conducting honest and unbiased research.
Note: Some traditional imams do not accept Ghazala as a legitimate precedent because she belonged to the Kharijite sect, a group of puritans, known for their piety, who revolted against Ali and Muawiya; however, this does not necessarily invalidate her actions).
(al-Tabari, History of Messengers and Kings, 51:80; Ali Masudi, Gardens of Gold, Dar al-Andalus, Beirut, 1965, 3:139).

____________________________________________________________________________________


Published in the 1-15 July 2005
Women cannot lead men in prayers
By Muhammad Abdus Samad
The Milli Gazette Online


Of late Juma prayer led by Dr. Amina Wadud as imam in the US has given rise to an opportunity to the enemies of Islam to criticise women’s rights and duties under Islam.

To start with, Jumu’a prayer is not Fard (obligatory) for woman, it is Fard only for men in Islam. So where does she get the right to lead men's obligatory prayer while it is not Fard for herself? To lead Jumu’a and Eid prayers is the exclusive right of a competent man in Islam. Women may voluntarily join Jumu’a and Eid prayers behind a male Imam with a view to gaining thawab (divine reward). By leading Jumu’a prayer of some men and women, Dr. Wadud has, in fact, transgressed her limits under Shari’ah. The Holy Qur’an announces: "Whosoever transgresseth Allah’s limits, he verily wrongeth his soul" (65:1).
At present the West demands gender equality in the name of women's liberation. Is this possible in reality? Man and woman cannot be equal because of their different physical structures and mindsets as bestowed on each of them by Allah. If, despite this, both man and woman are required to play the same role, it would certainly lead the society to indiscipline and chaos. This is why Islam has determined rights and duties of both men and women separately and it expects both of them to master their respective roles in order to secure a balance and parity between them. Islam thus wants to bring about this type of equity between man and woman.
In Islam a person is considered “Muslim” who believes in Allah and His prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and acts upon the divine laws (Shari’ah) revealed to the Prophet. Islam has ensured the rights and duties of both man and woman and they are required to enjoy these righs and duties within the limits set by the Qur’an and Sunnah of the Prophet. As such Islam maintains a demarcation line between man’s rights and duties and woman’s rights and duties which are based on their physical structure and mental abilities. No one is allowed to encroach upon others’ rights and duties. It is factually true that the man is naturally stronger than woman with regard to physical and mental power. Due to this reason man has been placed a degree above woman and granted some additional rights and duties than the latter. The Holy Qur’an announces: "And they (women) have rights similar to those (of men) over them in kindness, and men are a degree above them. Allah is Mighty, Wise " (2:228). Men are protectors and maintainers (qawwamun) of women" (4:34).

Since man is the protector and maintainer (qawwam) of woman as per the Holy Qur’an, he reasonably deserves the post of Imam (leader) of Jumu’a and other congregational prayers and guiding Muslim society. Any attempt contrary to this will violate the rights and duties as accorded to man in the Holy Qur’an.
Imam means leader, highest position in Islam after prophethood. Prophets of Allah were the best leaders and guides of humankind. It is a historical fact that no prophet was raised from womanfolk. Prophets led and guided their respective people in accordance with the divine law (Shari’ah) revealed to them and thereby tried to make them qualified for redemption in the next world. The first man who was formally made Imam for leading and guiding his people was Prophet Abraham (on him be peace).

"Allah said to Abraham: Lo! I have appointed thee Imam for mankind. Abraham said: And also of my offspring. Allah said: My covenant includeth not wrongdoers" (2:124). Respecting the right of Prophet Ibrahim (on him be peace), prophets succeeding him were traditionally appointed to the post of Imam for leading and guiding the ritual and social affairs of the mankind and in absence of prophets, this responsibility falls on competent men in the Islamic society. It is also a fact that only man are appointed as religious heads in Christianity, Judaism and Hinduism.

The Imam in Muslim society is appointed for a stipulated term and the success of Muslim society in both worlds in based on the role played by the Imam. Duty of Imam is confined not only to leading Jumu’a and other congregational prayers but also to leading and guiding the Muslim society in accordance with the divine law (Shari’ah). An Imam in reality is the head of the Islamic state (Ameer) elected or selected by its citizens. One of the most important duties accomplished by an Imam as the head of Islamic state is to lead Jumu’a and Eid prayers in the capital’s central mosque (grand Masjid). Besides, he has to look after the defence and other social and international affairs concerning his country.

Islam does not permit a woman to lead a nation as the head of state. A Hadith says that when the emperor of Persia died, his daughter was made the ruler of Persia by its people. When Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was informed about this, he warned, saying: “A nation ruled by a woman will not succeed".

It is expedient to mention here that there is a great difference between a Muslim state and an Islamic state. A state cannot be called an Islamic state until and unless it is governed by the Shariah. Neither Muslims, nor Islam, are safe in Muslim states. Islam and Islamists are facing persecution in Muslim states like Turkey, Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, Libya and Afghanistan. Similarly now we see the misuse and misinterpretation of some words like Imam, Ameer, Khalifa, Ilm, Jihad etc.

However, where Muslims are in a minority they should lead a collective life having an Imam elected or selected by them and this person leads Jumu’a and congregrational prayers and guides the Muslim society. Muslim are obligated to abide by the Imam (leader) they have elected or selected.

If a woman is made Imam for a stipulated period for leading Jumu’a and other congregational prayers and managing defence and social affairs in Muslim society, she would not be able to discharge her duties regularly due to some of her physical requirements such as pregnancy and post-delivery, rearing and breast feeding of baby and menstruation durations. A woman becomes ritually unclean and physically weak when she experiences such condiditions which require her to abstain from entering a mosque or offer prayer and keep fast. Under these circumstances a woman as Imam in Muslim society will not be able to discharge the required duties. Another reason that goes against a woman Imam is that if a man regularly leads Jumu’a prayer or attends it on Friday, it will be considered Fard for him while it is not so for women. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) did not regularly establish Tarawih prayers in Masjid fearing that Muslims may in future consider it Fard.

At present the West demands gender equality in the name of women's liberation. Is this possible in reality? Man and woman cannot be equal because of their different physical structures and mindsets as bestowed on each of them by Allah. If, despite this, both man and woman are required to play the same role, it would certainly lead the society to indiscipline and chaos. This is why Islam has determined rights and duties of both men and women separately and it expects both of them to master their respective roles in order to secure a balance and parity between them. Islam thus wants to bring about this type of equity between man and woman.

Has the West, which advocates equality between man and woman, been able to employ man and woman in all departments in equal ratio? No. Most of the departments in the West are run by men and 90% of staff are men. So how does the West criticise the rights and duties of Muslim women while it has itself failed to grant equality to its women?
The author is senior lecturer in P. B. College, Gauripur, Assam

Anger at Malaysia women travel curb - Al Jazeera Excerpt

Al Jazeera News Excerpt : News Asia-Pacific
Anger at Malaysia women travel curb ( 5 May 2008)

Women's groups in Malaysia have reacted with outrage over a senior official's proposal to require women travelling overseas alone to carry written consent for their journeys from their families or employers.

The proposal, put forward by Malaysia's foreign minister, Rais Yatim, was condemned by one group as "condescending" and a step backwards.

Raid mooted the plan as a way of responding to a string of drug trafficking cases involving Malaysian women who were travelling alone.

The women are believed to have been targetted by international syndicates for use as so-called "drug mules". government officials say.

The proposed measure is to ensure that a woman's family would "monitor her departure and serve as a preventive measure against being duped [by traffickers]", Malaysia's national news agency Bernama said.

Speaking to Al Jazeera Ivy Josiah, executive director of Malaysia's Women's Aid Organisation, said the suggestion was "very alarming" and a "sad reflection of the paternalistic values of our society".

'Condescending'
"The underlying assumption here is that women are weak and incompetent. It is a condescending idea and an unfair approach towards protecting women," she said on Monday.
"The focus should be on creating awareness on the dangers of drug trafficking instead of singling out women and restricting their movement."

Josiah said the government should instead look at a long-term plan that involves empowering women and educating men "because as we know crimes are largely perpetrated by men".
Rais was quoted at the weekend as saying that the idea was prompted by a review of criminal cases involving Malaysians abroad.

"It's a very patronising way of protecting women, and a bit too childish in many ways"

Masjaliza Hamzah, Sisters in Islam
He told Bernama that of the 119 cases of Malaysians detained in various countries for drug-related offences, 90 per cent were women and within the 21-27 age group.

Speaking to Al Jazeera, Masjaliza Hamzah, programme manager at advocacy group Sisters in Islam, said the proposal in effect curtailed women's movements.

"It is ridiculous and untenable in this day and age when women, and single women at that, are being elected ministers and running the country's finances," she said.

Travel advisory

A better idea would be to issue a general travel advisory for people to know what is in their luggage and to keep an eye on their belongings at all times, she said.

"It's a very patronising way of protecting women, and a bit too childish in many ways," she said.
"We're adults and a lot of women travel for work nowadays. Such a requirement will cause a lot of hassle."
Masjaliza also questioned the absence of official statistics for men who were detained abroad for drug-related offences.
Besides women's groups, the proposal was also criticised by another government minister who said it was an infringement on women's rights.

Ng Yen Yen, Malaysia's minister for women, family and community development, was quoted in The Star newspaper as saying that identifying the syndicates and understanding why and what kind of women were being lured into drug trafficking were equally important.

____________________________________________________________________________________

What do Israeli sex tourists in Thailand really think?


THAI LASS - Photo by Oxymanus

What do Israeli sex tourists in Thailand really think?
By Yotam Feldman, Haaretz Correspondent



On a steaming hot summer morning around three years ago, Guy Brucker, a student from the Haifa University, traveled the 165 kilometers from Bangkok to Pattaya, the sex tourism capital of Thailand. The silence of the other passengers in his taxi - an Israeli in his 50s, two German men and a Japanese man - made it unclear what they were after. Or not.

People go to Pattaya for only one reason," Brucker, 35, said. "Everybody knows that, but nobody talked about it on the way. I felt like I was climbing mental and physical mountains. I felt so very alone."

Unlike his fellow passengers, Brucker was not searching for sex in Pattaya, at least not in the customary sense. Brucker had traveled there within the framework of an anthropological study of Israeli men seeking sex services in Thailand. Over the course of three months, Brucker did not leave the city, which is viewed as heaven by some and as hell by others. Today he says he will not be traveling in Thailand in the future.

Brucker stayed at the "Mai Travel" hotel in the city, which accommodates, almost exclusively, Israeli sex tourists. He visited sex clubs, dined with Israeli sex tourists and played pool with them. In between activities, he interviewed some 60 men.

Amir (not his real name), a 39-year-old bachelor, said "I heard about Pattaya the same way everyone hears about it. But only when you arrive, and you breathe in the atmosphere and live the place, only then do you understand how much everything you were told is nothing, a pathetic tiny nothing of nothings, compared to the amazing and wondrous reality that awaits you here."

"The openness," Amir continued, "the humanity, the smiles of the beautiful sexy and open-minded women. It's not like the Israeli women, with their nose so far up in the air that it slaps Jumbo planes flying by in the sky."

Brucker, formerly a member of the Sha'ar Ha'amakim kibbutz, currently lives in Ramat Gan. He traveled to Pattaya alone after spending a week in Thailand with his girlfriend, Hila, a clinical psychologist. "I was afraid that Guy would get bored, and wouldn't be able to last three months," Hila said. "It wasn't that I was afraid he would do something, but three months seemed like too long to me. When we sat with Israelis and I heard them speak about the Thai women I was disgusted. I thought it was the most vulgar thing. Later, it became apparent that this kind of talk was the acceptable norm."

Do whatever you want

Brucker, an introverted type, overcame his natural shyness and bought a ticket to the infamous city through the Israeli Connection travel agency. "When the Thai driver called out 'Pattaya' I got a flashback of seven-year-old Guy breaking a soup bowl in the middle of the kibbutz dining hall during Shabbat dinner and the eyes of half the kibbutz turn to him, asking 'what's going on with Shmuel's son?'" Brucker writes in his report.

The hotel was not very striking, he writes. "You can see pictures of men hugging Thai women on the walls alongside thank you notes from former clients thanking the hotel owners for their hospitality. There are wooden tables in the lobby and a small room with three computers," he describes the scene. The room was the closest thing he could imagine to a whore house, he adds. "Inside there is a television, a DVD and a refrigerator with a box of condoms resting on top. Just in case, there is another condom on the bed, alongside burned DVDs of Israeli television shows and movies. The first thing I did was buy new sheets at the local supermarket. Just the thought of what previous guests had done on them?"

The first night, he writes, was a jarring experience. "A large number of women standing in the streets, touching you, inviting you, calling out to you. There is a sense of a lack of boundaries. I have never seen anything like it."

"It is difficult to reconcile all the papers I've read with the feeling this place gives me. With sex out in the open and seductive women, the defenses and the theories don't silence the libido. The city invites you. It tells you 'go do whatever you want' - there are girls here at your service and around you everyone is affirming the very behavior you've always criticized. Think of Eilat, an entire city, only all the streets are part of an enormous brothel. There is no where to run other than into your room and inside your head. Even when I went to buy food at the mall."

What happened there?

"I thought I could get a break. Everything is very sterile there, except perhaps the many pairs of Thai women and tourists. So I sat down at a restaurant to eat, and two women were making eyes at me for the duration of the entire meal. You could say men are sexually harassed in Pattaya. This way you can really understand how women feel."

On the second day, the city looked a little less inviting. Brucker describes his work as a defense mechanism protecting him from the feelings raised by his first encounter with the city. Maybe it was this defense mechanism that left him with no real friends during the three months he spent on the island. "Most of the time I was unhappy," he said. "The worst days were the ones during which no one wanted to be interviewed. I would find myself spending most of the day in the hotel room in front of the television. After that I would go to another restaurant, and another restaurant, and no one wanted to talk."

He managed to convince the Israeli men to talk to him relatively easily, during the afternoon hours at the hotel. Though most men were reluctant to divulge information about their lives in Israel, they were happy to describe their activities in Pattaya. There were those who even approached him voluntarily. The interviewees ranged from age 17 to 50s and 60s, from trash collectors to students to businessmen. Some of the men were permanent residents of the city - retired policemen or Israel Defense Forces officials who bought apartments in town and stayed for several years.

"They say that the economic situation in Israel is killing them and that the women are killing them. They have no sex lives. So in Pattaya, they say, they have relief on both fronts. They come to a vacation spot and feel like life is a vacation," Brucker said.

The Israelis he met were not ugly or repulsive in any way. However, many of them complained of having undergone a crisis over their manhood. They said they were disappointed by the economic situation, the loss of their youth, the materialistic culture, but more than anything they blamed the feminists and the Israeli women. The comparison between Israeli and Thai women always took center stage in his conversations with the Israeli men.

"I think it's the exact opposite of what happens in Israel," said Assaf, a 39-year-old bachelor. "In Israel women wait until they are 150 years old, and by then they have been eaten by worms in their graves for about 60 years. In Pattaya, women give off the signal 'we want to devour you, we're ready for anything with you, sex and romance too, so let's live because there are a lot of nuclear bombs in this world and some idiot could push a button and the world could go to hell.'"

"I felt handsome," said Ran, a good looking man of 21 who spent most of his time without a shirt on. "All the things that make you feel ugly at a young age - I stopped thinking about that nonsense a long time ago, thick eyebrows and all that crap. For a long time now I have thought that I have nice eyebrows after 20 thousand Thai women told me they were nice. This whole thing about maybe my hair is nasty, all those dumb thoughts you have about yourself: maybe this doesn't suit me, maybe this is why girls don't whistle at me, maybe because of this I have to work harder to get the girls, be cuter inside. But then you arrive here, and suddenly your hair is the most beautiful in the world."

Brucker emphasizes in his study that the victims of the sex trade, first and foremost, are the women, but he adds that men, too, have become the victims of the society they belong to. They suffer not only from the social requirements around them - to be rich, to be handsome, to be a chauvinist - but also from the merciless social requirement to get laid. "People there don't rest," he said. "They feel the need to have sex with more and more women. They don't care that they're tired, they don't listen to what their bodies are telling them."

Could this situation lead to positive things too, such as a more critical view of Israel?

I think that some of the men are extremely critical of Israel long before they arrive in Thailand, and their stay only reaffirms their criticism. The problem is that when they talk about being unhappy, they blame the women. If they complain about the value placed on having money, they'll eventually end up complaining about women and the feminism that has reared its head, about the fact that the man is not given his rightful place."

Like a rag for you

In his study, Brucker describes at length the otherworldly quality the men that visit Pattaya attribute to the city. They feel as though they are leaving the familiar world and moving into a parallel universe with an entirely different set of rules than the ones they are accustomed to. The anonymity and the lack of social restrictions are two key elements in their experience.

"Imagine me coming to Israel and suddenly becoming a different person," said Haim, a 54-year-old married insurance agent. "Think about it, I have to disconnect myself. I disconnect from what happened here, I don't recount experiences, I don't tell my wife. Here I am disconnected. It's hard because I have a family. I try? If it were up to me, I wouldn't call anyone at any time, I would disappear. But I call because I have a commitment, I call my parents, I call my family, but not too much. As little as possible."

Many of the men think of Pattaya as a liberal open space that allows them to overcome the inhibitions that characterize their sexual relations in their home country. Brucker was surprised to find how prevalent the cultural relativism theory, which originated in the social sciences departments, was among the tourists, and often used to justify. "They recruit the ideas of relativism to see an openness that doesn't really exist in Thailand, and by that justify their deeds," Brucker said.

Yoram, 60, married with two children, fifth time in Pattaya: "In Buddhism there is no taboo on sex, it's not a sin, not a crime, it's nothing, so these girls enjoy themselves from the get go. When you're with someone you can tell that she wants to have sex."

Moshe, a 24-year-old Jerusalem resident, added "Here, it is the most natural thing there is, that's how they are. They don't know any other way. It is the way they see things, they think that this is the way it should be. When you bring a girl to your hotel room nobody looks at you as if you're doing something wrong, because it is the most normal thing that could be."

These descriptions ignore the pain and the humiliation that define prostitution, like the physical and psychological violence prostitutes endure. Pattaya sees a very high incidence of murder and violence, Brucker said. Some of the interviewees even told him about bullying the women as though it were a natural part of the relationship between a tourist and a prostitute. "You feel that you can do anything," said Eli. "You come and you do everything, all the things you don't do with your wife out of respect, you let yourself do here. Because here they are like a rag for you. If one doesn't want to do something she can go home. There will be another one within seconds, so you can do whatever you want."

"We are our head, we have fantasy," said David. "We want to realize our fantasies, and we can't make them happen at home. With the Thai women you can do anything. You can bang her in the ass, she sucks you off, you can put your penis in her ear, her mouth, her nostril. You can do everything and everything alright. And why is that? Because with my employees, when I tell them to do something, they better do it. So even if she's a really good employee, she has to get up in the morning and go to work and she has to make my fantasies a reality because I am paying her money."

Against this background, it is easy to understand what Pattaya brings out in men. Brucker explains that more than anything, he was embarrassed by the treatment the hotel waitresses received. "These are 17-year-old girls from Laos. I felt the most shame over the way they were treated, more than other things, because I sat with men that they gave service to, I was part of them. You see them smack the waitresses on the back side, people telling the waitress she's stupid or ugly. I sat with them at the table and didn't tell anyone to stop, so I felt much more complicit in it than in other things."

Giving them Zionism

Despite the distance from Israel, tourists in Pattaya bring much of home with them. It's not only the Israeli hotels, with menus in Hebrew. "There was a group of paratroopers who came straight from reserves duty to the island," Brucker related. "One of them said that one day he didn't feel like leaving the hotel so he ordered a girl by telephone. He said 'I called the enlistment officer' referring to the woman who sends prostitutes to men."

Another interviewee, 26, went even further when he explained to Brucker about the ideological messages he insists on relaying to the prostitutes. "I give them a lot of Zionism, lots of Zionism. I talk about Israel constantly, about the army, how much I don't like Arabs and that they shouldn't go with Arabs? I tell them I was a paratrooper and that I fought the Arabs who killed my commander. I tell them that in Israel, radical Muslims carry out terror attacks. Somehow it isn't easy to explain it to them, but I try."

Brucker surmises that Israeli sex tourism, like domestic violence and sexist attitudes towards women, is directly connected to service in the IDF. As a combat fighter who was wounded during his service in the Israel Air Force's elite Shaldag commando unit, and through his work at a facility researching behavior of IDF troops, Brucker sees a clear connection between IDF service and sex tourism.

"You see how we have a culture of personal glorification, of saying that who you are is related to the occupation of the other. This is how people grow, through the subjugation of others. It's possible to see this in the way we don't acknowledge what is happening in Gaza or the failures of the Second Lebanon War. We see these as the result of us not finishing the job, because the resistance of the prostitute was too strong. She said there was a limit to how much you can trample on her."

One of Brucker's surprising revelations in his research was the way sex tourists in Pattaya would avoid or ignore the concept of prostitution, often crafting elaborate fantasies of romantic relationships with the women whose services they had purchased. Many of these men don't pay for the women's services outright, instead buying them gifts, inviting them to restaurants, and sending money to their families. Brucker sees this as a form of denial and personal fraud carried out by the men.

"This allows them to be present physically, while at the same time detached from the act," Brucker says.

"She really enjoys it," says Kobi, 40.

"I also love to tell her nice things, to whisper them to her, to hug her after sex, I love spoiling her before the sex. I do things for her that no one has ever done?She knows how to appreciate this," Kobi says, adding that he sees this as why "she didn't ask for money the first time. The sex was so good and she enjoyed it so much that at some point she just turned away the money?On many occasions, she tried to pay for things, but I prevented her from doing so, even when she said it's alright. I like giving her things, with the knowledge of course that she stays with me and doesn't go out with any other men."

One man, Dekel, says "she's in it for the fun" though he did admit that "I did pay her rent and bought her clothes, she can't say I owe her anything. I buy her food, buy her what she wants, little things of course."

But does Thailand allow men to pursue relationships they couldn't find with an Israeli woman who is only interested in their money? According to Brucker, "On a basic level, the place [Thailand] doesn't allow for relationships that aren't based on the exchange of money." Brucker added "this place doesn?t allow you to think of relationships in the same way they're thought of in Israel."

Brucker insists that a trip to Pattaya has a lasting effect on men after they return to Israel, in the way they treat women.

"The boss who returns from Pattaya will treat his female employees differently, he will treat women he meets at work, the pharmacy, the mall differently. One man told me, after Patayya, even when his wife tells him no he knows she really means yes."

Would these women still be considered prostitutes if they were to return to Israel with men they met in Thailand?

"For many women, this is the dream," Brucker says, "but in reality, its like winning the lotto, there is almost no chance it will happen." Still, Brucker says even in such hypothetical cases, he doesn't see any likelihood that the relationship would become any more equal than it was as a prostitute-client arrangement back in Thailand.

Brucker says that today there is a need to change legislation in order to prosecute men who travel to Thailand to take part in the sex trade, but in the meantime, it is up to women to prevent their husbands from going on such trips, or at least to tell them they are not naïve, and know the real reason they are flying to Thailand with their friends for "a two week trip to take in the sights.

____________________________________________________________________________________



Israel's sex trade
March 16, 2004
an exerpt

If you want to talk to Nomi Levenkron, be prepared to endanger her life. More than likely she'll be on the road when you call, pressing her cell phone to her ear as she speeds towards a women's lock-up in Haifa, or to a Knesset hearing in Jerusalem, or to the trial of a sex trafficker in Eilat. She'll tell you she's happy to talk but is in a rush. Could you call again in a few hours?

As legal director for the Migrant Worker's Hotline an organization that battles the scourge of trafficking in women for prostitution Nomi's workday often starts at 5 A.M. She carries two cell phones on her at all times. And she talks fast. Her fluent English outpaces most native speakers. When she switches to Hebrew, she seems to forgo drawing breath.

Nomi's days are spent crisscrossing the country, encouraging victims to take the stand against their traffickers, lobbying the authorities to take more action, and suing dangerous men for compensation on behalf of the women they brutalized. Once, after she filed suit in the case of a young Moldovan who had passed through the hands of six violent traffickers, friends came to Nomi?s home to say goodbye, assuming it was the last time they would see her.

During her first six months on the job, Nomi worked full time without salary. She admits its an addiction. "You don't really choose this kind of work," she says. "It's like heroin." Perhaps only an addict could spend 18 hours a day pursuing brutal criminals through the courts, have government officials call her a traitor for exposing Israel's dark side, and still not be discouraged when thousands more women are sold into sex slavery in her country every year. When she finally pulls up to the Hotline's offices in Downtown Tel Aviv, its already ten at night. Nomi releases her seatbelt buckle and the belt slides up across her bulging belly. She is five months pregnant.

Tel Aviv's red light district is only a short walk from Nomi's office on Rehov Ha Hashmal. Most of the brothel-lined streets are filthy, the buildings run-down. Trails of red arrows painted on the walls lead customers to "health clubs" and "massage parlors," all marked out by twinkling strips of colored lights that flash their patterns like cuttlefish enticing their prey.

The billboard for "5 Star Peep Show" on Rehov Neve Shaanan features the silhouette of a naked woman balanced precariously on the end of a dollar sign. She sits astride the bottom curve of the "S," straddling its final phallus-shaped curl. The silhouettes are everywhere. On Rehov Fin better known as "Rehov Pin" or "Penis" a reclining nude beckons clients into "Club Viagra." On Rehov Yesod Ha Maale the floating nude in one "Health Club" window tilts her head back as though in the throes of ecstasy, her feet pointed in the direction of a neighboring falafel stand.

The real women don't seem quite so eager. Through open doorways one can spot them glumly applying make-up or styling their hair. Sometimes they can be seen in brothel windows, chatting to each other and looking out onto the street as they smoke a cigarette. Most of the windows have bars on them. "In the majority of the brothels in Tel Aviv," says Meir Cohen, Head of Investigations for the Israeli National Police, "there is no question that most of the women there are trafficked."

The vast majority of women trafficked to Israel come from Romania and the countries of the former Soviet Union. Seduced by agents of organized crime, they agree to be smuggled into Israel, hoping to make good money. The women are usually young girls, like "Anna" (her real name has been suppressed) a 23-year-old Romanian who testified about her experience to an Israeli court in 2002.

Anna says that in 2001 she was approached in her hometown by an Israeli girl named Shula, who promised to get her work caring for the elderly in Tel Aviv. Shula booked Anna on a plane leaving from Bucharest, but Anna had no idea where it would land. When it touched down in Cairo, she thought she was in Israel. Collected by a liaison, she and a group of other women were driven across the desert in an open car, escorted by masked Bedouin armed with automatic weapons. At two in the morning, they left the cars and walked for several hours, then crawled on their stomachs under a chain-link fence.

Often, it is the Bedouin who are the first to tell victims of trafficking they will be working as prostitutes, as justification for sexually assaulting them. "As early as Egypt I found out that I was going to engage in prostitution in Eilat," one woman told the Hotline. "I tried to run away but a Bedouin got hold of me and beat me. In the evening, four Bedouin raped me, one after the other. I was bleeding and I couldn't walk, it hurt me so much between my legs.I wanted to die."

Since Anna was "lucky" enough not to be raped in transit, she still had no idea what awaited her. After crossing the border she was picked up by a man identified in court records as George Ben-Abraham Yosef, who drove her to Tel Aviv. There, Yosef took Anna to a hotel, and ordered her to strip in front of a roomful of men.

The ordeal is known as an "auction." Like traders in a cattle market, the traffickers inspect the "goods" and bid for the women they want to buy. "[The woman] is made to stand naked in the middle of a room," a female trafficker told Maariv. "[The traffickers] touch her breast, her ass.They check her tongue, her teeth, to see if she's healthy. They touch her private parts.They tell her, "walk forward, backwards, strike poses like a model, wiggle it honey, bend over. Lower. Let's see what you're worth." Traffickers are not necessarily picky about the venue of an auction. In one case a woman was stripped, inspected, and sold for $6,000 in the men's room of a McDonald's.

When the Hotline first contacted Nomi five years ago to ask for her help, trafficking in women was not even a crime under Israeli law. Nomi, then in law school, wasn't interested. She had studied criminology and was more intrigued by criminals than victims. But she had one skill that was crucial to the Hotline - she spoke Romanian.

"Although I had a very hard childhood [in Romania], I'm very grateful for it now," says Nomi. Without Romanian, she would never have gotten involved. The Hotline convinced her to volunteer for just a few hours, speaking to detained women in prison. What Nomi heard from them the brutality they suffered from both criminals and police shocked her into a new consciousness: "I started to say to myself, 'something is really wrong with this country on this issue.?" Two hours of volunteering a week became two hours a day, then 18 hours a day, until finally Nomi was getting only four hours of sleep. When she slept, she dreamt about work.

The plight of the Moldovan sold to six different traffickers proved a watershed for Nomi. The woman wanted to testify but the police wouldn't listen. At the time, women who had been trafficked weren't considered victims. "A prostitute was considered as a partner in crime," says Meir Cohen, the police investigator. Instead of testifying, victims were simply arrested and deported. Police were instructed not to intervene in brothels. The authorities preferred to use pimps as intelligence sources for other underworld investigations.

The police in Beersheba told Nomi that her client was lying, that it wasn't important. So she sued the traffickers in civil court. She sued the police for not investigating. She even sued the ministry of interior for not issuing the woman a visa. Suddenly, the police began to pay attention. More than 50 men were arrested almost immediately. "It was funny," says Nomi. "There were almost no men left in Beersheba."

In May of 2000, Amnesty International had published an embarrassing report that condemned Israel for its cavalier attitude towards sex slavery. The resulting public clamor forced the Knesset to make trafficking in women an explicit crime with a maximum penalty of 16 years in prison. Enforcing the new law was another matter.

"No one wanted to deal with the problem," says Member of Knesset Marina Solodkin, who sits on the Parliamentary Inquiry Committee on Female Trafficking. "It was easier to just pretend that these women were new immigrants from the FSU and were not being trafficked into Israel." But efforts by Nomi and other activists to publicize the issue finally paid off when, in 2001, the U.S. State Department placed Israel on a "blacklist," among countries that were failing to combat trafficking in women.

The State Department's report was not simply a stain on Israel's reputation. United States law forbids the government from providing non-humanitarian aid to countries put on the blacklist. Washington had jerked back the economic reins. The Israeli government was forced to do a complete about-face. A national police unit was established to investigate the sex trade. And officials insist their entire approach has changed. "Today, one of the central elements of the war against organized crime is trafficking in women," says Cohen.

The challenge is daunting. Demand for prostitution in Israel is enormous, with an estimated one million visits to brothels every month. Human rights organizations estimate that 3,000 women are brought into the country as sex slaves every year. The women come primarily from Russia, Moldova, and the Ukraine, where the collapse of social safety nets in post-communist economies has created a ready supply of destitute women.

In a Hotline survey of trafficked women conducted at Neve Tirza women's prison, one third said that they, like Anna, had no idea they would be engaging in prostitution when they came to Israel. Others knew they would be prostitutes, but were promised good conditions by the traffickers. They were told they would have to take only a limited number of customers each day and that they would earn a thousand dollars a month (a massive sum in most Eastern European countries). Eventually, the traffickers said, they would be able to leave the brothels.

In the parlor, laughter is forbidden. Girls must always smile and sit straight. "I would sit there wearing thin pantyhose and freezing in the air conditioning," "Natasha," a Russian victim of trafficking told the Hotline. "Laughing was not allowed because the client might think he was being made fun of and leave."

When Anna was first taken to a brothel, she didn't know what it was. Yosef had put her in the hands of a man identified in court records as Yuri Ben-Michael Gur. "Yuri told me that he had bought me for a lot of money and I had to do what he said to do prostitution," Anna testified. "That's how I realized that I had been sold like an animal."

Anna was given tight, see-through clothes and told to put them on. Then she was ordered into a room with a man identified in court records as Menasha Ben-Avraham Faraj. Another girl had already told Anna that this was the man who visited the brothel whenever a new girl arrived. As the other men stood outside and laughed, Faraj raped and sodomized her. The "right" to have sex, including by force and without a condom, with an acquired woman, is taken for granted by most traffickers.

After her horrific initiation, Anna was forced to take clients whenever they selected her. Customers paid 150 shekels, which Anna had to give to Gur's underlings. For each client they would give her back only 20 shekels, with which she had to pay for food and contraceptives. In the end she was always left with nothing.

According to other women interviewed by the Hotline, brothel owners made them work seven days a week and an average of 13 hours a day. They had to work during their periods, using diaphragms to prevent blood from leaking. "The meetings with the clients were short just 15 minutes," according to Natasha. After the client finished, she would rush to the tepid showers, then back down to the freezing lobby.

The customers who frequent these brothels are regular Israelis. Soldiers in uniform get discounts. Orthodox Jews stuff their skullcaps into their pockets when they enter, then replace them when they leave. If a customer is dissatisfied, the girl is beaten. But as one 18-year-old victim told Hotline volunteers, "they beat you so as not to leave any marks, because clients don't like to see a woman with bruises." If a woman gets ill or pregnant, she is taken to a veterinarian or a back-alley abortionist.

About half the women interviewed by Hotline volunteers said they had been incarcerated in locked brothels. "Try and escape," one of Gur's employees told Anna, "and I'll crush your head in the door." In one notorious case, two women were tied up in a cage on Tel Aviv's Rehov Pin and forced to provide sexual services. But even if the doors aren't locked, the women are always prisoners. Their traffickers confiscate their passports and threaten their loved ones. "The Russian mob knows exactly how to get to their families," says Nomi. "It is enough for them to say to the prostitutes, if you don't want to see your grandmother's house burned down or your 12-year old sister taken as a prostitute, you better do what we tell you."

At a conference on prostitution in August 2002, Police Major General Moshe Mizrahi stepped to the podium and stated the obvious: "Trafficking in women here is run by organized crime." Though his announcement was no revelation, Mizrahi's willingness to make it was unusual. For years, Israeli officials have consistently denied or downplayed the existence of organized crime groups within Israel's borders. But faced with a multi-billion-dollar sex-slaving trade and its serious political implications, the elephant in the room has become too dangerous to ignore.

According to a report by Nomi and her staff, trafficking in Israel is made possible by "an international network of criminal organizations, most of whose members are from the countries of the former Soviet Union." Almost 80 percent of the women Nomi interviewed said their traffickers were Israelis whose origins are in Russia or other FSU countries. Their language skills and local connections give such traffickers a professional advantage.

"The Russians do quality work in crime. That's Russian education for you," says Police Superintendent and Spokesperson Gil Kleiman. Kleiman believes the trafficking networks are so successful because they are made up of individuals who grew up and served in prison together. Their connections and experience allow them to coordinate the complex arrangement of recruiters, bribes, intermediaries, and buyers that an international smuggling operation requires. "It's always a 'Sasha,'" says Nomi. "One 'Sasha' recruits them in Moldova, another 'Sasha' is waiting for them in Egypt, another meets them when they arrive in Israel. Its organized perfectly."

Once the women get to the brothels, traffickers use intimidation and violence to keep them enslaved, and to ensure that those who escape do not testify. One former prostitute recounted how her trafficker drove her to a beach and threatened to drown her if she caused any trouble. When Anna refused to work and stayed in her room to pray, her pimp beat her with her own bible, screaming "this is not a church."

Traffickers prefer not to murder their prostitutes, since killing them would mean a loss of "merchandise." But sometimes examples are made of woman who break "house rules." In June 2002, police found the body of a woman dressed in revealing clothes, who had been strangled and dumped in the street of Eilat's red light district. In October of that year, 42-year-old prostitute Svetlana Lukatzky was bound, beaten, and stabbed to death.

Trafficked woman also find themselves the victims of turf battles between organized crime groups. To assert dominance, traffickers will abduct women from their competitors, as in the case of one call girl who was ordered to a customer's hotel room only to be thrown in the trunk of a car and driven to her new owner. In other cases, brothels have been firebombed as part of gangland feuds, leaving women burned and maimed.

Fear and corruption outside the brothel combine to keep victims of trafficking enslaved. "People are scared," says Nomi. "When we try to convince them to go to the police to complain about the brothels operating in their neighborhood, they say, 'What are you joking? The traffickers will kill me.' There is a lot of fear in Israel of the Russian mob."

If citizens do screw up the courage to complain to the police, they are quite likely to be met with indifference. "In Tel Aviv [the police] understand what is going on," says Nomi. But in most places "its a different story. They couldn't care less and they don't see [trafficking] as a serious crime. They think these women really enjoy what they're doing."

Nomi acknowledges that the police today do listen much more. "In the beginning we had to sue for every victim. It was hard. But after two or three cases, they learned don't mess with them." Nomi says enforcement has been improving since the state department's report. But she blames the police for creating the crisis by ignoring trafficking in the nineties. For her, the new efforts are far too little and much too late.

Even in Tel Aviv, Meir Cohen admits, most brothels operate freely. He says the law does not allow police to shut them down without proof that the women have been trafficked and kept there against their will. Since most women are too terrified to complain, the system favors the traffickers.

But fear of reprisals is not the only reason prostitutes do not go to the police. According to a Hotline survey, 40 percent of the ex-prostitutes interviewed said policemen were clients at their brothels. And some reported seeing money change hands between pimps and police officers. In one case, a woman said the police tipped her pimp off about an impending raid. And in another a woman claimed the police dragged an escaped prostitute back to their brothel.

Police officials angrily dismiss such claims. "These allegations are bullshit!" fumes Police Superintendent Gil Kleiman. But they are not without proven precedent. In one noted case, a police officer named Oskar Siss was not only a customer but cooperated with traffickers to buy and sell women and coerce them into prostitution. "Without a doubt, there exists collaboration between the police and the pimps," says MK Solodkin.

Though seeking the help of the police might seem risky to many women trapped in prostitution, their only other hope for freedom buying it back is a chimera. When a woman is trafficked to Israel, she is charged both for the cost of being smuggled and, paradoxically, for the price of being acquired. But while the traffickers make back the purchase price on a woman they buy in a matter of weeks through the money clients pay for her services, the woman herself is paid almost nothing. And her debt is compounded both by exponential rates of interest and numerous fines for invented "infractions," from refusing a client to chewing gum.

The debt, of course, is never meant to end. Being sold to another trafficker generates a new debt, and if a woman ever comes close to repaying it she is sold once again. "They are traded and sold from one trafficker to another like a piece of merchandise," says Cohen. And so the victim remains in bondage.

Anna was lucky. Shortly after Yosef picked her up, when she still thought she was being taken to her job as an elder-care worker, they stopped at Lod airport on the way to Tel Aviv. Yosef briefly left her alone in the car to run an errand. As she sat in the passenger seat smoking a cigarette, a security guard approached her and asked her to move the car. "She spoke no Hebrew at all," says Nomi. "So she said to him in Romanian, 'Leave me alone.' And he replied in Romanian so they started talking. He made her take his cell phone number because he thought something was wrong. She said that everything was okay."

After three weeks in the brothel, Anna happened to get a Romanian client. She asked him where exactly she was, then sneaked a call to the security guard on one of the employees' unattended cell phones. The security guard received the message and went to see her, posing as a customer. He then went straight to Tel Aviv's main police station and insisted on seeing the head of the vice unit. Within 48 hours, the police stormed the brothel and arrested Yosef and Gur.

Most victims of trafficking don't get the chance to orchestrate a police raid from within a brothel. A few pluck up the courage to flee (Nomi notes that most of those who do come to the Hotline, not the police). Others are arrested in chance raids. Either way, the women are detained as illegal immigrants and scheduled for deportation.

Nomi is a regular at the detention centers, informing the women of their rights and urging them to testify against the men who trafficked them. Convincing a former prostitute to take the stand after all she's experienced is a tough sell. But "big court cases" aren't always so crucial. "If you told her a joke and made her smile, that's enough for me," says Nomi. "Just make those women laugh. It's just as important."

Those who do decide to testify are put up by the police in unguarded hostels. Galit Saporta, who works with the Hotline, regularly takes a team of volunteers to one such hostel in Tel Aviv (to ensure the women's safety, Nomi and Galit insisted its location not be published). "There are approximately 40 women staying in the hotel waiting to testify," says Galit, who despite being eight months pregnant still visits the hostel each week. She makes sure the women are aware of their rights and are receiving the medical care and 150 shekels a week in pocket money (spent entirely on cigarettes) they are entitled to.

Galit's visits have another, unspoken purpose. Women in line to testify against traffickers have a habit of "disappearing" from the hostels. If Galit can account for all the girls she knows are among the hostel's guests, she can ensure they're safe. Still, women can wait up to a year to testify, giving the traffickers plenty of time to find out where they're staying. One day in the hostel, Anna's roommate handed her a cell phone. On the other end was a man who spoke Romanian. He said Gur and Yosef had paid him to hurt her family. If she didn't withdraw the complaint, he'd set her parents on fire.

In April 2002, Anna took the stand and testified against Gur, Yosef, and Faraj. Gur and Yosef were both found guilty of trafficking in women and were each sentenced to eight years in prison. Faraj received a two-and-a-half year term for rape. The convictions are one more sign that Nomi's hard work is paying off. Since the beginning of 2002, Tel Aviv police have busted five major prostitution networks, culminating in the arrest and conviction of Mark Gaman, who police believe is the country's leading sex racketeer. Gaman- the owner of several massage parlors and gambling clubs survived a car bombing in 1996 that left numerous shrapnel scars on his body. Those distinctive mob markings allowed many of his victims to identify him to the police. Gaman was convicted and sentenced to ten years hard labor.

Whenever they lecture, the prosecutors say 'look at Mark Gaman,'" says Nomi. She is standing by the bulletin board in her little office on the Hotline's floor, staring at a picture of the victim with whom she grew closest. She was forty years old with a child waiting back home and the main witness against Gaman. Six months after the trial she committed suicide. "Very few people know about it," says Nomi.

Other stories have happier endings. Nomi often gets invited to weddings of former sex workers who married Israelis. She points to a picture of another woman on the bulletin board. "The one in white is already a mother," says Nomi. "She was told by a gynecologist that she would never be able to have a child. But now she has a son."

Further along is a small wedding photo, a happy couple. The woman is Anna, smiling in her wedding gown. After testifying, she and the security guard who rescued her fell in love. "It was worth everything just to meet him," she told Nomi. "Divine intervention, of course," Nomi comments dryly. Nomi and her boyfriend recently got married themselves. But when people say "Mazel Tov" on hearing the news, she waves off their congratulations. "Ach," says Nomi. "We only did it so that my parents wouldn't say they had a prostitute in the family."